Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39588393›Full record

Trial reportDrug design, development and therapy2024

Comparative Analysis of Hemodynamic Effects of Remimazolam and Propofol Combined with Esketamine in Colonoscopic Procedures in the Elderly.

Bo-Ran Deng, Yang Zhang, Zi-Feng Xie, Ding-Ding Wang, Tao Zeng, Dong-Bo Zhang, Li Huang, Qi-Yan Wang, Tu Shen, Qiao-Ling Wu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug design, development and therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Comparison of the EDDrug design, development and therapy · 2026
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Safety of Remimazolam in Vulnerable Populations.Drug design, development and therapy · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bo-Ran Deng *Surgical Anesthesia Center, Zigong Hospital of TCM, Zigong, 643000, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0002-6361-917X
Yang Zhang *Department of Anesthesia, Da'an District Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Zigong, 643000, People's Republic of China.
Zi-Feng Xie *Department of Anesthesia, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, 121000, People's Republic of China.
Ding-Ding Wang *Department of Anesthesia, EYE & ENT Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, 200031, People's Republic of China.
Tao ZengSurgical Anesthesia Center, Zigong Hospital of TCM, Zigong, 643000, People's Republic of China.
Dong-Bo ZhangDepartment of Anesthesia, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, 121000, People's Republic of China.
Li HuangSurgical Anesthesia Center, Zigong Hospital of TCM, Zigong, 643000, People's Republic of China.
Qi-Yan WangSurgical Anesthesia Center, Zigong Hospital of TCM, Zigong, 643000, People's Republic of China.
Tu ShenDepartment of Anesthesia, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, 121000, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0009-0001-6003-2966
Qiao-Ling WuDepartment of Anesthesia, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, 121000, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The debate continues over the differential impact of remimazolam vs propofol on hemodynamic stability. This study aims to elucidate the effects of a combination of remimazolam and esketamine vs propofol and esketamine on hemodynamic parameters in elderly patients undergoing painless colonoscopies. Patients and Methods: We conducted a randomized controlled trial involving 754 patients, divided equally between two treatment groups. The remimazolam-esketamine group (RE group) received 0.15 mg/kg of remimazolam and 0.3 mg/kg of esketamine. Conversely, the propofol-esketamine group (PE group) was administered 1.5 mg/kg of propofol with 0.3 mg/kg of esketamine. Primary outcomes focused on the incidence of hypotension. Secondary outcomes assessed were other hemodynamic adverse events, intraoperative blood pressure and heart rate fluctuations, usage of vasoactive agents, sedation efficacy, and additional adverse reactions. Results: Hypotension occurred significantly less frequently in the RE group (9.78%, 95% confidence interval[CI]: 6.67-12.87%) compared to the PE group (23.57%, 95% CI: 21.22-30.52%), Conclusion: Remimazolam combined with esketamine offers superior hemodynamic stability and significantly reduces adverse event rates compared to propofol plus esketamine in elderly patients undergoing painless colonoscopies, while maintaining effective sedation.

Indexed as

ColonoscopyHemodynamicsKetaminePropofolAgedAged, 80 and overBenzodiazepinesFemaleHumansHypnotics and SedativesMaleBenzodiazepinesEsketamineHypnotics and SedativesKetaminePropofolremimazolamcolonoscopyelderly patientsesketaminehemodynamic effectsremimazolam

Identifiers

PMID39588393
PMCPMC11586265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.