ArticleFrontiers in immunology2024
Immunogenicity assessment strategy for a chemically modified therapeutic protein in clinical development.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Enzymatic Nanomotors Integrated with Plant Extracts: Biochemical Mechanisms, Applications, and Clinical Perspectives.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Strategies to Improve the Lipophilicity of Hydrophilic Macromolecular Drugs.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Assessment of Neutralizing Antibody Activity in Clinical Studies: Use of Surrogate Measurements Instead of Stand-alone Assays.The AAPS journal · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical immunogenicity assessment for complex multidomain biological drugs is challenging due to multiple factors that must be taken into consideration. Here, we describe a strategy to overcome multiple bioanalytical challenges in order to assess anti-drug antibodies (ADA) for a novel and unique chemically modified protein therapeutic. A risk-centered approach was adopted to evaluate the immunogenic response to a modified version of human growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) connected to an albumin-binding fatty acid via a polyethylene glycol (PEG) linker. Key steps include monitoring anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), using a standard tiered approach of screening and confirmation. To deepen our understanding of ADA response, as a third tier of immunogenicity assessment, novel extensive characterization using a set of assays was developed, validated, and used routinely in clinical sample analysis. This characterization step included performance of titration, mapping of ADA response including anti-GDF15 and anti-PEG-fatty-acid antibody characterization, and assessment of the neutralizing anti-drug antibodies (NAbs) using cell-based assays for immunogenicity in parallel. The analytical methods were applied during two clinical trials involving both healthy volunteers and overweight or obese patients. We observed low incident rates for ADA and no ADAs against the PEG linker with fatty acid conjugation. In one of the clinical studies, we identified neutralizing ADAs. The proposed novel strategy of extensive characterization proved effective for monitoring the presence of ADAs and NAbs and can be used to support clinical development of a broad range of chemically modified proteins and multidomain biotherapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.