ReviewFrontiers in oncology2024
Lymph node assessment in cervical cancer: current approaches.
Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating lymph node metastases in cervical cancer: the added value of T2/DWI MRI fusion compared to standard MRI alone and 18 F-FDG PET/CT.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Nonmetastatic Para-aortic Lymph Node Remodeling as a Predictor of Outcome in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026Article
- Schwannoma Mimicking Neck Nodal Metastasis on F-18 FDG PET/CT in Cervical Cancer: A Case Report with a Multimodal Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Optimized sentinel nodes detection in endometrial cancer: intraoperative indocyanine green mapping with postoperative bread-loaf slicing ultrastaging.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: Multiparametric MRI in Gynecologic Oncology and Precision Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The trend of utilizing de-escalation of surgical extent for treating early-stage cervical cancer patients.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2025Article
- Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology (ASGO) 2024 Annual Meeting in Bali, Indonesia.Journal of gynecologic oncology · 2025Article
- Comprehensive analysis of mRNA and lncRNA expression for predicting lymph node metastasis in cervical cancer: a novel seven-gene signature approach.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most common neoplasia in women worldwide. Although early-stage CC is often curable, 40 to 50% of patients are diagnosed at a locally advanced stage. Metastatic disease accounts for the principal cause of death. Lymph node (LN) status is a major factor impacting treatment options and prognosis. Historically, CC was staged based only on clinical findings. However, in 2018, imaging modalities and/or pathological findings were included in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging classification. In the last decades, LN status assessment has evolved considerably. Full pelvic lymphadenectomy used to be the only way to determine LN status. Currently, several options exist: surgery with full lymphadenectomy, sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy or imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET). Regarding surgery, the SLN biopsy technique has become a standard procedure in cases of CC, with indocyanine green (ICG) being the preferred dye. Pelvic MRI is a valuable imaging technique modality for the evaluation of pelvic LNs. In locally advanced or in early-stage disease with suspicious LNs on CT scans or MRI, PET/CT is recommended for assessment of nodal and distant status. The best strategy for LN assessment remains a highly controversial topic in the literature. In this article, we aim to review and compare the advantages and limitations of each modality, i.e. imaging or surgical (lymphadenectomy or SLN biopsy) approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.