Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39588308›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2024

Lymph node assessment in cervical cancer: current approaches.

Adriane Dheur, Athanasios Kakkos, Denis Danthine, Katty Delbecque, Frédéric Goffin, Elodie Gonne, Pierre Lovinfosse, Clémence Pleyers, Alain Thille, Frédéric Kridelka and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Nonmetastatic Para-aortic Lymph Node Remodeling as a Predictor of Outcome in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Adriane DheurDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Liège, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Athanasios KakkosDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Liège, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Denis DanthineDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Liège, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Katty DelbecqueDepartment of Pathology, University Hospital of Liège, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Frédéric GoffinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Liège, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Elodie GonneDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Liège, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Pierre LovinfosseDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, University Hospital of Liège, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Clémence PleyersDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Hospital of Liège, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Alain ThilleDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Liège, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Frédéric KridelkaDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital of Liège, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Christine GennigensDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Liège, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer (CC) is the fourth most common neoplasia in women worldwide. Although early-stage CC is often curable, 40 to 50% of patients are diagnosed at a locally advanced stage. Metastatic disease accounts for the principal cause of death. Lymph node (LN) status is a major factor impacting treatment options and prognosis. Historically, CC was staged based only on clinical findings. However, in 2018, imaging modalities and/or pathological findings were included in the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging classification. In the last decades, LN status assessment has evolved considerably. Full pelvic lymphadenectomy used to be the only way to determine LN status. Currently, several options exist: surgery with full lymphadenectomy, sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy or imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET). Regarding surgery, the SLN biopsy technique has become a standard procedure in cases of CC, with indocyanine green (ICG) being the preferred dye. Pelvic MRI is a valuable imaging technique modality for the evaluation of pelvic LNs. In locally advanced or in early-stage disease with suspicious LNs on CT scans or MRI, PET/CT is recommended for assessment of nodal and distant status. The best strategy for LN assessment remains a highly controversial topic in the literature. In this article, we aim to review and compare the advantages and limitations of each modality, i.e. imaging or surgical (lymphadenectomy or SLN biopsy) approaches.

Indexed as

cervical cancerimaging modalitieslymph node assessmentsentinel lymph nodesurgical staging

Identifiers

PMID39588308
PMCPMC11586254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.