ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Screening high-risk individuals for primary gastric adenocarcinoma: evaluating progression-free survival probability score in the presence and absence of Rictor expression after gastrectomy.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Integrating CD45 + CD3+ and CD3 + CD8+ T-cell markers into nomograms for predicting survival in gastroesophageal junction carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Developing nomogram-based risk stratification model to determine 3-year and 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and to identify high-risk patients with gastric adenocarcinoma based on different Rictor statuses. Methods: 1366 individuals who underwent radical gastric surgery to treat gastric adenocarcinoma at Shanxi Cancer Hospital from May 2002 to December 2020 were analyzed. Cox regression analysis was employed to create the nomograms. The nomograms' performance was assessed using C-index, time receiver operating characteristic (t-ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) curves in training and validation cohorts. Subsequently, patients were categorized into high-risk and low-risk groups based on the nomogram's risk scores. Results: The Rictor (-) nomogram for predicting PFS included variables such as age, number of positive lymph nodes, vascular invasion, maximum diameter of the tumor, omentum metastasis, and expression of MSH2. In the internal validation, the C-index of the Rictor (-) nomogram was 0.760 (95%CI: 0.720-0.799), which was superior to the C-index of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition TNM staging (0.683, 95%CI: 0.646-0.721). Similarly, the Rictor (+) nomogram for predicting PFS included variables such as gender, age, pT stage, number of positive lymph nodes, neural invasion, maximum diameter of the tumor, omentum metastasis, Clavien-Dindo classification for complications, and CGA expression. The C-index of the Rictor (+) nomogram was 0.795 (95%CI: 0.764-0.825), which outperformed the C-index of the AJCC 8th edition TNM staging (0.693, 95%CI: 0.662-0.723). The calibration curves, t-ROC curves, and decision curve analysis for both nomogram models demonstrated their excellent prediction ability. Conclusion: This study presents the first risk stratification for Rictor status in gastric adenocarcinoma. Our model identifies low-risk patients who may not require additional postoperative treatment, while high-risk patients should consider targeted therapies that specifically target Rictor-positive indicators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.