Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39588277›Full record

ArticleJournal of market access & health policy2024

Developer and Partnership Differences in COVID-19 and Other Infections: Insights from DNA Vaccines.

Ryo Okuyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of market access & health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ryo OkuyamaCollege of International Management, Ritsumeikan Asia Pacific University, Beppu 874-8577, Japan; ryooku@apu.ac.jp.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9820-7741

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Historically, vaccine development has been heavily supported by government and public institutions. On the other hand, private biopharmaceutical companies have played a significant role in the development of innovative new therapies using novel pharmaceutical technologies. COVID-19 vaccines using new vaccine technologies, such as mRNA and adenoviral vectors, were rapidly developed by emerging biopharmaceutical companies in collaboration with large corporations and public organizations. This underscores the crucial role of emerging biopharma and public-private partnerships in advancing new vaccine technologies. While these innovations have been suggested as models for future vaccines, their applicability to other infectious diseases requires careful assessment. This study investigated the characteristics of the developers and partnerships in the development of DNA vaccines as a next-generation vaccine platform. The analysis revealed that while emerging biopharmaceutical companies and private-private and private-public partnerships were crucial during the COVID-19 pandemic, public organizations and public-public collaborations primarily led to the clinical development of vaccines for other diseases. Strategies for vaccine development using new vaccine technologies should be tailored to the specific characteristics of each disease.

Indexed as

biopharmaceutical companyclinical developmentdeveloperDNA vaccinepartnershippublic institution

Identifiers

PMID39588277
PMCPMC11587068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.