ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2024
Enhancing Transfection Efficacy in Glioma Cells: A Comparison of Microfluidic
Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Camptothecin-Bearing PEGylated Polypropylenimine Dendriplexes for Prostate Cancer Gene Therapy: Impact of Microfluidic Processing on Physicochemical Properties and Transfection.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Microfluidic Platforms for Ex Vivo and In Vivo Gene Therapy.Biosensors · 2025Review
- Intravenous Delivery of Angiopep-Functionalized Polypropylenimine Dendriplex Enhances Gene Expression in the Brain.International journal of nanomedicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Gene therapy is a promising therapeutic approach for treating various disorders by introducing modified nucleic acids to correct cellular dysfunctions or introduce new functions. Despite significant advancements in the field, the effective delivery of nucleic acids remains a challenge, due to biological barriers and the immune system's ability to target and destroy these molecules. Due to their branched structure and ability to condense negatively charged nucleic acids, cationic dendrimers have shown potential in overcoming these challenges. Despite this, standardized scalable production methods are still lacking. This study investigates the use of microfluidics to formulate generation 3-diaminobutyric polypropylenimine (DAB) dendriplexes and compares their characteristics and in vitro gene delivery efficacy to those prepared using conventional manual mixing. Methods: DAB dendriplexes were produced by both microfluidic and manual approaches and characterized. Their cellular uptake and gene expression were evaluated on C6 glioma cancer cells in vitro. Results: Dendriplexes formed using microfluidics at the optimal flow rate and ratio demonstrated enhanced DNA condensation over time, achieving up to 97% condensation at 24 hours. Both preparation methods produced positively charged dendriplexes, indicating stable formulations. However, dendriplexes prepared through hand mixing resulted in smaller particle sizes, significantly higher cellular uptake and gene expression efficacy compared to those prepared by microfluidics. Nonetheless, microfluidic preparation offers the advantage of standardized and scalable production, which is essential for future applications. Conclusion: This study highlights the potential of microfluidic technology to improve precision and scalability in gene delivery, paving the way for future advancements in gene therapy. Our findings suggest that, with further optimization, microfluidic systems could provide superior control over dendriplex formation, expanding their potential use in gene therapy applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.