ArticleRSC advances2024
Facile assembly of flexible humidity sensors based on nanostructured graphite/zinc oxide-coated cellulose fibrous frameworks for human healthcare.
Article in RSC advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preparation of cellulose/zinc oxide/graphene oxide ternary hybrid aerogel to photodestruction of anionic dye from aqueous environment.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Advanced polymer-based humidity sensor for aerospace applications implementing ZnO-G: theoretical and experimental study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of flexible, cost-effective, highly efficient, and reliable humidity monitoring sensors is in high demand owing to their wide-range of applications in industrial domains. In this study, a humidity sensor was fabricated based on graphite/zinc oxide nanoparticle (G/ZnO-NP)-coated cellulose paper. A bar device was designed using computer software, and its sketch was printed on cellulose paper, with graphite bars then added using the pencil-drawing method, and then ZnO-NP paste was coated on the graphite patterns. Scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction analysis were used to respectively inspect the morphological and structural features of the samples. For sensor fabrication, copper wires were attached to the electrodes using copper tape. The fabricated device was placed into a chamber with varying relative humidity (RH) levels of 11%, 24%, 43%, 62%, 84%, and 97%, controlled using the salt solutions inside the chamber. The response of the sensor was recorded in terms of the change in resistance of the device upon exposure to different humidity environments. The sensor delivered a response time as short as 4.31 s for the 24% RH condition, and a recovery time as short as 10.05 s for 43% RH. Moreover, the sensor exhibited a sensitivity of 717% for the 97% RH condition. The sensor was also evaluated for human breath monitoring, showing distinctive responses for inhalation and exhalation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.