ArticleNeuropsychiatric disease and treatment2024
Anhedonia in Major Depressive Disorder: Prevalence and Treatment Expectations and Satisfaction with Treatment Goals Among Patients and Physicians in Asia-Pacific.
Article in Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Altered core depressive symptom balance in post-COVID fatigue: reduced depressed mood in an exploratory matched historical-control study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the prevalence of anhedonia (ANH) in major depressive disorder (MDD) and treatment expectation and satisfaction among patients with MDD and physicians in the Asia-Pacific region. Methods: This cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted in April-May 2023 among physicians and individuals aged ≥18 years with self-reported physician diagnosis of MDD (9-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9] score ≥ 10) further stratified by anhedonia as measured by the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS): MDD-ANH (SHAPS score > 2) and MDD non-ANH (SHAPS score ≤ 2). The study assessed the prevalence of anhedonia in MDD as well as the perspectives on the treatment of anhedonia in MDD in terms of expectations and satisfaction among patients and physicians. Results: The regional estimated prevalence of MDD was 16.1% where 52.5% of MDD respondents had ANH (SHAPS score ≥2). Depressed mood, mental changes, and changes in sleeping patterns prompted MDD-ANH (n = 1448) or MDD non-ANH (n = 836) respondents to seek medical consultation. Respondents with MDD-ANH (vs MDD non-ANH) reported significantly higher levels of depression and anhedonia, longer treatment duration, and preferred switching their existing medications over adding additional medications (all, p < 0.001). Over half of physicians (55.0%) were not treating anhedonia separately. Anhedonia-specific treatment goals seemed important to all respondents, while avoiding suicidal ideation was significantly important to physicians. MDD-ANH respondents reported in general the lowest level of satisfaction with treatment goals than MDD non-ANH and physician, with "improvements in sexual satisfaction" being the treatment goal with the lowest level of satisfaction. Conclusion: This first large-scale study conducted across the Asia-Pacific region provides a recent update on the prevalence of MDD and anhedonia in MDD and highlights unmet needs in the current therapeutic landscape for anhedonia in MDD, emphasizing the need for novel treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.