Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39588088›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2024

Breeding and biotechnology approaches to enhance the nutritional quality of rapeseed byproducts for sustainable alternative protein sources- a critical review.

Anandhavalli Manikandan, Saraladevi Muthusamy, Eu Sheng Wang, Emelie Ivarson, Sudha Manickam, Rajeswari Sivakami, Manikanda Boopathi Narayanan, Li-Hua Zhu, Ravikesavan Rajasekaran, Selvaraju Kanagarajan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Regional Cultivation Forms ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anandhavalli ManikandanDepartment of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Centre for Plant Breeding and Genetics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Saraladevi MuthusamyDepartment of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Lomma, Sweden.
Eu Sheng WangDepartment of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Lomma, Sweden.
Emelie IvarsonDepartment of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Lomma, Sweden.
Sudha ManickamDepartment of Plant Biotechnology, Centre for Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Rajeswari SivakamiCentre for Plant Breeding and Genetics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Manikanda Boopathi NarayananDepartment of Plant Biotechnology, Centre for Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Li-Hua ZhuDepartment of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Lomma, Sweden.
Ravikesavan RajasekaranCentre for Plant Breeding and Genetics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Selvaraju KanagarajanDepartment of Plant Breeding, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Lomma, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global protein consumption is increasing exponentially, which requires efficient identification of potential, healthy, and simple protein sources to fulfil the demands. The existing sources of animal proteins are high in fat and low in fiber composition, which might cause serious health risks when consumed regularly. Moreover, protein production from animal sources can negatively affect the environment, as it often requires more energy and natural resources and contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. Thus, finding alternative plant-based protein sources becomes indispensable. Rapeseed is an important oilseed crop and the world's third leading oil source. Rapeseed byproducts, such as seed cakes or meals, are considered the best alternative protein source after soybean owing to their promising protein profile (30%-60% crude protein) to supplement dietary requirements. After oil extraction, these rapeseed byproducts can be utilized as food for human consumption and animal feed. However, anti-nutritional factors (ANFs) like glucosinolates, phytic acid, tannins, and sinapines make them unsuitable for direct consumption. Techniques like microbial fermentation, advanced breeding, and genome editing can improve protein quality, reduce ANFs in rapeseed byproducts, and facilitate their usage in the food and feed industry. This review summarizes these approaches and offers the best bio-nutrition breakthroughs to develop nutrient-rich rapeseed byproducts as plant-based protein sources.

Indexed as

anti-nutritional factorsbreeding strategiesgenome editingmicrobial fermentationnutritional enhancementrapeseed byproductsseed storage proteins

Identifiers

PMID39588088
PMCPMC11586226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.