ArticleERJ open research2024
The Canadian Bronchiectasis and Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Registry: a study protocol.
Article in ERJ open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bronchiectasis is a complex, chronic disease with geographic and ethnic diversity. While the most substantial cohort studies have been conducted in Europe and the USA, Canada also faces considerable challenges. The comprehensive Canadian Bronchiectasis and Nontuberculous Mycobacterial (NTM) Registry aims to 1) outline the clinical characteristics and natural history of bronchiectasis in Canada, 2) identify risk factors contributing to disease progression within Canadians, 3) integrate comprehensive clinical information to better understand the phenotypes of bronchiectasis and 4) support the development of large-scale, randomised controlled trials in Canada. Methods: The Canadian Bronchiectasis and NTM Registry is an ongoing prospective, longitudinal, multi-centre, observational cohort study. It aims to enrol at least 2000 participants to collect data such as medical history, aetiological assessments, lung function tests, microbiological profiles, radiographic evaluations, comorbidities and quality of life (QoL) metrics. Participants will undergo annual follow-ups to gather longitudinal information regarding outcomes, treatments and changes in QoL. The inclusion criteria are a diagnosis of bronchiectasis by clinical history and computed tomography and/or pulmonary NTM infection as defined by American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines. The study's protocol received ethical approval from the lead site, the University of Calgary, with future additional approval from local ethics committees at all participating centres. Discussion: The outcomes of the registry will be instrumental in uncovering the clinical traits and natural history of bronchiectasis. This longitudinal study will be used for analysis to form evidence-based clinical practices and serve as a resource in Canada to inform future studies in NTM and bronchiectasis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.