ReviewArrhythmia & electrophysiology review2024
Revisiting the Atrioventricular Conduction Axis for the 21st Century.
Review in Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- High-resolution 3D visualization of human hearts with emphases on the cardiac conduction system components-a new platform for medical education, mix/virtual reality, computational simulation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- 3D Anatomy of the Atrioventricular Conduction Axis Reconstructed Relative to Gross Anatomical Landmarks Using Hierarchical Phase-contrast Tomography.Arrhythmia & electrophysiology review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this review, we summarise the ongoing debate surrounding the anatomy of the atrioventricular conduction axis and its relevance to pacing. We highlight previous disagreements and emphasise the importance of understanding the anatomical location of the axis. We give credit and support to the initial descriptions by His and Tawara, in particular their attention to the relationship of the atrioventricular conduction axis with the membranous septum. We express our disagreements with recent diagrams that incorrectly, in our opinion, depict the left bundle and right bundle branches. We offer our own latest understanding of the location and relationships of the atrioventricular conduction axis, including details of its development, and differences between human and animal hearts. We also emphasise the importance of understanding the relationship between the inferior pyramidal space and the inferoseptal recess so as appropriately to place the axis within the heart. We conclude by emphasising the need to consider the heart in the context of the body, describing its component parts by using attitudinally appropriate nomenclature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.