Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39588028›Full record

ArticleCanadian medical education journal2024

Resident and supervisor perceptions of gaining obstetrical competency in Family Medicine: a qualitative descriptive study.

Nisha Arora, Sudha Koppula, Judith Belle Brown

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian medical education journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Focus on faculty development.Canadian medical education journal · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nisha AroraDepartment of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, Ontario, Canada.
Sudha KoppulaDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Alberta, Alberta, Canada.
Judith Belle BrownCentre for Studies in Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Canadian Family Medicine (FM) residents, upon graduation, are disinclined to provide intrapartum care. The FM resident experience with obstetrical training has not been studied in over a decade while the FM landscape has changed. This study explored the FM resident experience in working towards their obstetrical competencies as one of the chief influences on their career decision to provide intrapartum care or not. Methods: Using a qualitative descriptive design, we conducted semi-structured interviews with second-year FM residents ( Results: FM residents working towards their intrapartum skills are influenced by the following themes: the learners' unique and individual experience and expectations; opportunities in the training environment; and learning obstetrics in the changing FM landscape. Notably, the influence of FM maternity care role models permeated all themes. Conclusion: This study offers insight into potential areas of intervention to improve the FM residency training experience in intrapartum care. Investment in FM maternity education, in the undergraduate and postgraduate medical curricula, with continued support in practice, is critical to maintain comprehensive education and patient care, especially while Canada faces a maternity care crisis.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceFamily PracticeInternship and ResidencyObstetricsQualitative ResearchAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleOntarioPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID39588028
PMCPMC11586020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.