ReviewHealth science reports2024
The Efficacy and Safety of Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy Combined With Platelet-Rich Plasma in Chronic Refractory Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Health science reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cell Membrane-Coated Nanoparticles: Advanced Drug Delivery Systems for Chronic Wound Healing Therapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Chronic refractory wound is a disease that seriously impairs the quality of life of patients. Negative pressure wound therapy and platelet-rich plasma are commonly used to treat various types of wounds. Further research is necessary to explore the efficacy and safety of the combination of negative pressure wound therapy and platelet-rich plasma in treating chronic refractory wounds. Methods: PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, CNKI, Sino Med, and Wanfang Med Online up until March 2024 were searched(PROSPERO No. CRD42024507963). Two investigators screened literature according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, evaluated bias and certainty of evidence using RoB 2.0 and GRADE. Stata 12.0 was used to analyze the data. Results: A total of 35 randomized controlled trials involving 2495 participants were included. 34 studies were assessed as having some concerns, and 1 study as having high risk in the risk of bias assessment. The results of meta-analysis showed that effective rate (RR1.23, 95% CI [1.17, 1.30], Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the combination of negative-pressure wound therapy and platelet-rich plasma can improve the efficacy and safety on chronic refractory wounds. Optimal parameter combinations, elucidation of pathogenesis and treatment mechanisms can be explored in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.