Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39587873›Full record

ArticleMolecular informatics2025

Interpret Gaussian Process Models by Using Integrated Gradients.

Fan Zhang, Naoaki Ono, Shigehiko Kanaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Deciphering the performance of different surface models for corneal topography.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fan ZhangDivision of Information Science, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara, 630-0192, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-1209-4635
Naoaki OnoDivision of Information Science, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara, 630-0192, Japan.
Shigehiko KanayaDivision of Information Science, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara, 630-0192, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gaussian process regression (GPR) is a nonparametric probabilistic model capable of computing not only the predicted mean but also the predicted standard deviation, which represents the confidence level of predictions. It offers great flexibility as it can be non-linearized by designing the kernel function, made robust against outliers by altering the likelihood function, and extended to classification models. Recently, models combining deep learning with GPR, such as Deep Kernel Learning GPR, have been proposed and reported to achieve higher accuracy than GPR. However, due to its nonparametric nature, GPR is challenging to interpret. While Explainable AI (XAI) methods like LIME or kernel SHAP can interpret the predicted mean, interpreting the predicted standard deviation remains difficult. In this study, we propose a novel method to interpret the prediction of GPR by evaluating the importance of explanatory variables. We have incorporated the GPR model with the Integrated Gradients (IG) method to assess the contribution of each feature to the prediction. By evaluating the standard deviation of the posterior distribution, we show that the IG approach provides a detailed decomposition of the predictive uncertainty, attributing it to the uncertainty in individual feature contributions. This methodology not only highlights the variables that are most influential in the prediction but also provides insights into the reliability of the model by quantifying the uncertainty associated with each feature. Through this, we can obtain a deeper understanding of the model's behavior and foster trust in its predictions, especially in domains where interpretability is as crucial as accuracy.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAlgorithmsHumansNormal Distributionexplainable AIgaussian processintegrated gradients

Identifiers

PMID39587873
PMCPMC11695984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.