Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39587768›Full record

ReviewJournal of environmental quality

Effects of glyphosate on antibiotic resistance in soil bacteria and its potential significance: A review.

Bradley L Bearson, Cameron H Douglass, Stephen O Duke, Thomas B Moorman, Patrick J Tranel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of environmental quality. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bradley L BearsonUSDA-ARS, National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7033-7424
Cameron H DouglassUSDA, Office of the Chief Economist, Office of Pest Management Policy, Washington, District of Columbia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8738-6887
Stephen O DukeNational Center of Natural Products Research, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7210-5168
Thomas B MoormanUSDA-ARS, National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment, Ames, Iowa, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7409-0609
Patrick J TranelDepartment of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0666-4564

Funding

Agricultural Research Service Cooperative Agreement 58-6060-6-015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolution and spread of antibiotic resistance are problems with important consequences for bacterial disease treatment. Antibiotic use in animal production and the subsequent export of antibiotic resistance elements in animal manure to soil is a concern. Recent reports suggest that exposure of pathogenic bacteria to glyphosate increases antibiotic resistance. We review these reports and identify soil processes likely to affect the persistence of glyphosate, antibiotic resistance elements, and their interactions. The herbicide molecular target of glyphosate is not shared by antibiotics, indicating that target-site cross-resistance cannot account for increased antibiotic resistance. The mechanisms of bacterial resistance to glyphosate and antibiotics differ, and bacterial tolerance or resistance to glyphosate does not coincide with increased resistance to antibiotics. Glyphosate in the presence of antibiotics can increase the activity of efflux pumps, which confer tolerance to glyphosate, allowing for an increased frequency of mutation for antibiotic resistance. Such effects are not unique to glyphosate, as other herbicides and chemical pollutants can have the same effect, although glyphosate is used in much larger quantities on agricultural soils than most other chemicals. Most evidence indicates that glyphosate is not mutagenic in bacteria. Some studies suggest that glyphosate enhances genetic exchange of antibiotic-resistance elements through effects on membrane permeability. Glyphosate and antibiotics are often present together in manure-treated soil for at least part of the crop-growing season, and initial studies indicate that glyphosate may increase abundance of antibiotic resistance genes in soil, but longer term investigations under realistic field conditions are needed. Although there are demonstratable interactions among glyphosate, bacteria, and antibiotic resistance, there is limited evidence that normal use of glyphosate poses a substantial risk for increased occurrence of antibiotic-resistant, bacterial pathogens. Longer term field studies using environmentally relevant concentrations of glyphosate and antibiotics are needed.

Indexed as

BacteriaDrug Resistance, BacterialGlyphosateHerbicidesSoil MicrobiologyAnti-Bacterial AgentsSoil PollutantsAnti-Bacterial AgentsGlyphosateHerbicidesSoil Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID39587768
PMCPMC11718153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.