Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39587703›Full record

ArticleContraception and reproductive medicine2024

Social media as health educator: An assessment of the understandability and accuracy of tiktok content about contraception.

Julianna K Coleman, Maetal E Haas-Kogan, Andrea Pelletier, Rachel E Stoddard, Natasha R Johnson, Julia R Beatini, Nora Y Sun, Alex S Keuroghlian, Deborah Bartz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contraception and reproductive medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Julianna K ColemanHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Maetal E Haas-KoganHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Andrea PelletierHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Rachel E StoddardDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Natasha R JohnsonHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Julia R BeatiniDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Nora Y SunHarvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Alex S KeuroghlianHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Deborah BartzHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. dbartz@bwh.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundContraception knowledge and attitudes are largely formed from conversations within one's social network. More recently, this network has expanded to include social media. As the fastest growing social media platform, we aimed to assess popular contraception videos on TikTok for content understandability, actionability and accuracy.

methodsThis is a secondary analysis of the most viewed, contraception-specific TikTok videos that were previously coded as containing educational messaging in a content-analysis study. We assessed videos for understandability (ability to explain a key message) and actionability (identify what they can do to act on that message) using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-A/V) instrument and for Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose (CRAAP) using a modified instrument within the health information education literature.

resultsThe 174 videos with educational content scored as understandable but not actionable in PEMAT-A/V assessment, with videos created by healthcare providers (HCPs) performing better than those by non-HCPs in six of eleven domains of understandability. Videos overall scored well in relevance and purpose within the CRAAP assessment. Videos created by HCP's (n = 99) scored higher than those by non-HCPs (n = 75) in relevance (score = 3.9 versus 3.3), authority (score = 4.8 versus 1.7), accuracy (score = 6.0 versus 3.5), and purpose (score = 7.1 versus 5.7) [all p < 0.001]. Regarding video engagement, the median number of views among the videos in the cohort was 604,450. Of all video views, 79.2% were of HCP-created videos and 20.8% were of non-HCP videos. DISCUSSION: Much of the contraceptive educational messaging on TikTok is understandable, relevant, and accurate. HCP-created videos overall scored better as compared to other creators, though even HCP-created videos score fail to provide actionable recommendations. The videos created by HCP also had greater metrics of engagement. Given this, we encourage HCPs to use social media to better inform its users.

Indexed as

AccuracyBirth controlContraceptionHealth educationMisinformationPEMATRelevanceSocial mediaTikTok

Identifiers

PMID39587703
PMCPMC11590206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.