Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39587670›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2024

Urinary DNA-methylation and protein biomarkers identify urothelial carcinoma among other genitourinary diseases and cancer-free individuals.

Kerstin Lang, Christina U Köhler, Katharina Wichert, Thomas Deix, Georg Bartsch, Gudrun Sommer, Christiane Lübke, Florian Roghmann, Moritz J Reike, Harald Krentel and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Kerstin LangInstitute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum (IPA), 44789, Bochum, Germany.
Christina U KöhlerInstitute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum (IPA), 44789, Bochum, Germany.
Katharina WichertInstitute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum (IPA), 44789, Bochum, Germany.
Thomas DeixURO DR, Clinic of Urology and Andrology, Mülheimer Str. 37, 40878, Ratingen, Germany.
Georg BartschURO DR, Clinic of Urology and Andrology, Mülheimer Str. 37, 40878, Ratingen, Germany.
Gudrun SommerSurgery of Gynecology, Husemannplatz 6-7, 44787, Bochum, Germany.
Christiane LübkeSurgery of Gynecology, Husemannplatz 6-7, 44787, Bochum, Germany.
Florian RoghmannDepartment of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany.
Moritz J ReikeDepartment of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany.
Harald KrentelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bethesda Hospital, Duisburg, Germany.
Katja EngellandtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bethesda Hospital, Duisburg, Germany.
Sven SchiermeierDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Marien-Hospital, University Witten-Herdecke, Witten, Germany.
Valentin MenkeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, St. Anna Hospital, Herne, Germany.
Joachim NoldusDepartment of Urology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany.
Thomas BehrensInstitute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum (IPA), 44789, Bochum, Germany.
Thomas BrüningInstitute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum (IPA), 44789, Bochum, Germany.
Heiko U KäfferleinInstitute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr University Bochum (IPA), 44789, Bochum, Germany. heiko.kaefferlein@dguv.de.ORCID 0000-0001-5150-4979

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor more than 80 years, cystoscopy has been the gold standard for identification of urothelial carcinoma (UCa). Because of many factors, such as pain of the patients during this procedure or the costs involved, non-invasive detection of UCa remains a challenge. Herein, we verify our previously identified urinary biomarkers C-X-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 16 (CXCL16) and transforming growth-factor beta induced protein (TGFBI) on the protein level as well as the CpG sites ALOX5, TRPS1 and an intergenic region on Chromosome 16 on DNA methylation level in an independent cross-sectional study.

methodsWe collected N = 1119 urines from individuals coming to urological and gynecological check-ups, follow-up care or patients suspicious for UCa or already diagnosed for different urologic or gynecologic cancer entities. We performed methylation analysis of various CpG sites with DNA isolated from urine sediment and quantified the concentration of the protein markers CXCL16 and TGFBI in the corresponding urine supernatant using ELISA. We tested for patient-group differences with two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum tests and examined the performance with receiver operating characteristic curves. For verification, we analyzed the marker performance with previously set cutoff-values and marker combinations with established and experimental algorithms (with logical OR-conjunction, iterative threshold-based biomarker and score combining algorithm "PanelomiX").

resultsEvaluation confirmed that our previously identified protein and DNA methylation biomarkers can distinguish UCa from frequent urological and gynecological cancers. CXCL16 and TGFBI discriminated UCa cases with a sensitivity of 31% and 56% and a specificity of 94% and 85%, respectively. Combining methylation markers resulted in UCa detection in men with a sensitivity of 54% and a specificity of 94%. Extending analysis by combining all methylation and protein markers (up to five markers in total) yielded a convincingly high specificity of 97% at a sensitivity of 72% for the identification of UCa patients within a heterogeneous collective of cancer-free individuals and patients suffering from urological or gynecological cancers.

conclusionCombining various biomarkers at protein and DNA level demonstrates a new option of non-invasive UCa diagnosis in urine, and thus might help to reduce the number of unnecessary cystoscopies, especially in patients without a history of UCa.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorDNA MethylationAdultAgedCpG IslandsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedROC CurveUrogenital NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkersBladder cancerDNA methylationUrineVerification

Identifiers

PMID39587670
PMCPMC11590282

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.