Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39587661›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2024

Dose prediction of CyberKnife Monte Carlo plan for lung cancer patients based on deep learning: robust learning of variable beam configurations.

Yuchao Miao, Jiwei Li, Ruigang Ge, Chuanbin Xie, Yaoying Liu, Gaolong Zhang, Mingchang Miao, Shouping Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yuchao MiaoNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Jiwei LiACCURAY, China National Nuclear Corporation, Tianjin, China.
Ruigang GeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Medical Center of the People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chuanbin XieDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The First Medical Center of the People's Liberation Army General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yaoying LiuSchool of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Gaolong ZhangSchool of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing, China.
Mingchang MiaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China.
Shouping XuNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China. shouping_xu@yahoo.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 11975040National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 81801799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate calculation of lung cancer dose using the Monte Carlo (MC) algorithm in CyberKnife (CK) is essential for precise planning. We aim to employ deep learning to directly predict the 3D dose distribution calculated by the MC algorithm, enabling rapid and accurate automatic planning. However, most current methods solely focus on conventional intensity-modulated radiation therapy and assume a consistent beam configuration across all patients. This study seeks to develop a more versatile model incorporating variable beam configurations of CK and considering the patient's anatomy.

methodsThis study proposed that the AB (anatomy and beam) model be compared with the control Mask (only anatomy) model. These models are based on a 3D U-Net network to investigate the impact of CK beam encoding information on dose prediction. The study collected 86 lung cancer patients who received CK's built-in MC algorithm plans using different beam configurations for training/validation (66 cases) and testing (20 cases). We compared the gamma passing rate, dose difference maps, and relevant dose-volume metrics to evaluate the model's performance. In addition, the Dice similarity coefficients (DSCs) were calculated to assess the spatial correspondence of isodose volumes.

resultsThe AB model demonstrated superior performance compared to the Mask model, particularly in the trajectory dose of the beam. The DSCs of the AB model were 20-40% higher than that of the Mask model in some dose regions. We achieved approximately 99% for the PTV and generally more than 95% for the organs at risk (OARs) referred to the clinical planning dose in the gamma passing rates (3 mm/3%). Relative to the Mask model, the AB model exhibited more than 90% improvement in small voxels (p < 0.001). The AB model matched well with the clinical plan's dose-volume histograms, and the average dose error for all organs was 1.65 ± 0.69%.

conclusionsOur proposed new model signifies a crucial advancement in predicting CK 3D dose distributions for clinical applications. It enables planners to rapidly and precisely predict MC doses for lung cancer based on patient-specific beam configurations and optimize the CK treatment process.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLung NeoplasmsMonte Carlo MethodRadiosurgeryRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsHumansOrgans at RiskAutomatic planningCyberKnifeDeep learningDose predictionMonte Carlo

Identifiers

PMID39587661
PMCPMC11587619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.