Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39587623›Full record

SynthesisReproductive health2024

The psychometric properties of fear of childbirth instruments: a systematic review.

Bibi Leila Hoseini, Abbas Ebadi, Ali Mashhadi, Mohammad Hassan Rakhshani, Raheleh Babazadeh

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reproductive health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bibi Leila HoseiniDepartment of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, Student Research Committee, School of Nursing & Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
Abbas EbadiNursing Care Research Center, Clinical Sciences Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Ali MashhadiPsychology & Clinical Neuropsychology, Department of Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (FUM), Mashhad, Iran.
Mohammad Hassan RakhshaniDepartment of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences, Sabzevar, Iran.
Raheleh BabazadehNursing and Midwifery Care Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. babazadehr@mums.ac.ir.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnxiety disorders with a specific focus on fear of childbirth (FOC) are the most common mental health challenges in perinatal women. The accurate measurement of FOC is important for correctly identifying women with FOC, as well as for identifying the target population for treatment. We aimed to review FOC scales and evaluate their psychometric properties via the COSMIN methodology to identify the most suitable available instruments.

methodsWe conducted this systematic review via a comprehensive search of databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Science Direct and ProQuest, to identify articles published from inception to May 2024 via combined keywords related to tools that assess FOC in women during pregnancy or postpartum period. The quality of the psychometric properties of the included studies was evaluated via the COSMIN checklist.

resultsOf the 1160 records found initially, 47 articles were included in this review, 24 of which were related to the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire (W-DEQ). According to the recommended categorization of the COSMIN methodology, among the 18 assessed scales, the Fear of Childbirth Questionnaire (FCQ) was categorized as A, and 11 scales, including the Fear-of-delivery Questionnaire (FDQ), W-DEQ-A & B, Delivery Fear Scale (DFS), Fear of Birth Scale (FOBS), Birth Anticipation Scale (BAS), Childbirth Fear Questionnaire (CFQ), Childbirth Fear Scale (CSF), Slade-Pais Expectations of Childbirth Scale (SPECS), and unnamed tools by Melender et al. (2005) and Eriksson et al. (2005) were categorized as B.

conclusionAccording to the findings, the FCQ can be recommended for evaluating pregnant women with FOC. The measures categorized as B are potentially recommended for use, but further research is needed to evaluate the quality of this group.

Indexed as

FearParturitionPsychometricsDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesChildbirthFearPregnant womenPsychometricScaleTokophobia

Identifiers

PMID39587623
PMCPMC11590611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.