SynthesisWorld journal of surgical oncology2024
Efficacy of arterial compression hemostasis devices in liver cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in World journal of surgical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo systematically evaluate the efficacy of arterial compression hemostasis devices after femoral artery puncture interventions for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
methodsWe systematically searched 10 electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and CBM) up to October 20, 2024, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of arterial compression hemostasis devices used after HCC interventions through femoral artery puncture. We used the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool to evaluate the trial quality, and we analyzed the data with Review Manager 5.4 software.
results17 RCTs involving 2,338 participants met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis demonstrated that, compared with conventional manual compression combined with sandbags, the use of arterial compression hemostasis devices significantly shortened the compression hemostasis time [MD = -13.9 min, 95% CI, -14.19 to -12.19; P < 0.00001] and limb immobilization time [MD = -8.79 min, 95% CI, -12.65 to -4.94; P < 0.00001]. Additionally, it significantly reduced the incidence of local bleeding [RR = 0.28, 95% CI, 0.20 to 0.40; P < 0.00001], hematoma formation [RR = 0.29, 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.46; P < 0.00001], skin ecchymosis [RR = 0.25, 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.35; P < 0.00001], dysuria [RR = 0.22, 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.34; P = 0.0002], skin damage [RR = 0.16, 95% CI, 0.05 to 0.54; P = 0.003], backache [RR = 0.28, 95% CI, 0.13 to 0.64; P = 0.002], and pseudoaneurysm [RR = 0.22, 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.51; P = 0.0004].
conclusionsThe analysis revealed that arterial compression hemostasis devices significantly reduce hemostasis and immobilization time, as well as vascular complications in liver cancer patients undergoing interventional therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.