Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39587557›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2024

Formulating recommendations to improve care for persons living with dementia: deliberative dialogues with multiple stakeholders in the province of Quebec, Canada.

Alexandra Lemay-Compagnat, Deniz Cetin-Sahin, Laura Rojas-Rozo, Geneviève Arsenault-Lapierre, Yves Couturier, Howard Bergman, Isabelle Vedel, COVID-ROSA Research Team

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alexandra Lemay-CompagnatLady Davis Institute for Medical Research at the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Deniz Cetin-SahinLady Davis Institute for Medical Research at the Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada. deniz.sahin@mail.mcgill.ca.
Laura Rojas-RozoDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Geneviève Arsenault-LapierreCenter for Research and Expertise in Social Gerontology, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé Et Services Sociaux du Centre-Ouest de L'Ile-de-Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Yves CouturierDepartment of Social Work, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada.
Howard BergmanDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Isabelle VedelDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada. isabelle.vedel@mcgill.ca.
COVID-ROSA Research Team

Funding

CIHR VR5-172692
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersons living with dementia and their care partners encounter many challenges within the health and social care system, including lack of information, support, counselling, and access to community services, as well as significant staff turnover in home care services. The objective of this study was to work with multiple stakeholders to formulate relevant and feasible recommendations to improve care for persons living with dementia and their care partners in Quebec, Canada.

methodsWe conducted deliberative dialogues in the context of a large mixed methods study on the care of persons living with dementia and care partners. First, we organized two deliberative dialogues with care partners to formulate recommendations informed by the quantitative and qualitative results of the large study. These recommendations were further discussed in a third deliberative dialogue focused on the prioritization of relevant and feasible recommendations by clinicians, health project managers, and decision-makers. We performed a thematic analysis of the data using a multi-level framework: structural, organizational, provider, and patient perspectives.

resultsParticipants formulated 14 recommendations. Two structural-level recommendations included fighting ageism and ensuring the same access to services in the whole province. Three organizational-level recommendations involved improving interdisciplinarity collaboration, improving access and follow-up in primary care, and adapting emergency departments. Additionally, two organizational-level recommendations were specific to healthcare crisis management (such as the COVID-19 pandemic): ensuring both the regular communication and the flexibility of implemented rules. Four provider-level recommendations encompassed providing more training on dementia, offering more training on levels of care, reviewing the relationship-based approach in training programs, and revising and optimizing medications. There were three patient-level recommendations including strengthening partnerships with persons living with dementia and care partners, guaranteeing personalized services and care, and reinforcing support for care partners.

conclusionThe deliberative dialogues enabled us to formulate relevant recommendations based on research evidence, the lived experience of care partners, and the expertise of clinicians, health project managers and decision-makers. The results revealed several recommendations that will help mitigate the challenges faced by persons living with dementia and care partners in the health and social care system by informing policies and practices.

Indexed as

DementiaStakeholder ParticipationCaregiversCOVID-19FemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleQuality ImprovementQuebecCliniciansDecision-makersDeliberative dialogueHealthcareHealth project managersInformal care partnersPersons living with dementiaRecommendations

Identifiers

PMID39587557
PMCPMC11590613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.