ArticleMolecular cancer2024
Co-occurring mutations identify prognostic subgroups of microsatellite stable colorectal cancer.
Article in Molecular cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing risk gene discovery across the allele frequency spectrum.HGG advances · 2026Review
- Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer: Clinically Relevant Diagnostic and Prognostic Molecular Features, and the Future of Precision Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Effect of chemotherapy on passenger mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer.Molecular oncology · 2026Article
- Association of APOBEC mutagenesis with stromal and endothelial niche remodeling and PCDH9-linked signaling alterations in colorectal cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- The impact of APC mutation on the efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer with RAS wild type: a retrospective analysis.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2026Article
- Early mutational events and clonal dynamics in normal crypts: implications for colorectal tumorigenesis.Human genomics · 2025Review
- Article
- Mutations in tumor signaling, metastases, and synthetic lethality establish distinct patterns.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- IMOP-Cancer: identifying mutation order pairs impacting cancer phenotypes.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Signature Gene Mutations in Colorectal Cancer: Potential Neoantigens for Cancer Vaccines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- UnravelingCancer drug resistance (Alhambra, Calif.) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCo-occurring mutations in pairs of genes can pinpoint clinically relevant subgroups of cancer. Most colorectal cancers (CRCs) are microsatellite stable (MSS) and have few frequent mutations. Large patient cohorts and broad genomic coverage are needed for comprehensive co-mutation profiling.
methodsCo-mutations were identified in a population-based Swedish cohort analyzed by whole-genome sequencing (n=819 stage I-IV MSS CRCs). Prognostic value was further evaluated in a publicly available dataset of clinically sequenced metastatic CRCs (MSK-IMPACT; n=934 MSS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses with clinicopathological parameters were performed for locoregional (stage I-III) and metastatic (stage IV and recurrent) cancers separately.
resultsPrevalent co-mutations were detected in 23 unique gene pairs, 20 of which included APC, TP53, KRAS and/or PIK3CA. Several co-mutations involving APC were associated with good overall survival in locoregional CRC, including APC-TCF7L2 (multivariable HR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.27-0.89). This co-mutation was prognostic also in metastatic cancers (multivariable HR: 0.49 and 0.37, 95% CI: 0.24-0.98 and 0.17-0.82 in the Swedish and MSK cohorts, respectively). APC-SOX9 co-mutations were mutually exclusive with APC-TCF7L2, and the co-mutations combined had stronger prognostic associations than APC alone in both metastatic cohorts. BRAF p.V600E-RNF43 co-mutations were associated with poor overall and recurrence-free survival in locoregional CRC (multivariable HR: 4.13 and 3.2, 95% CI: 1.78-9.54 and 1.53-8.04, respectively).
conclusionsWe report a genome-wide evaluation of co-occurring mutations in MSS CRCs, and suggest that co-mutations can improve the prognostic stratification compared to single mutations alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.