ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024
Intraoperative angulation of the C-arm for X-ray of each curved surface of the femoral neck wall: a cadaveric study.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundC-arm fluoroscopy is the main method assisting surgical reduction and internal fixation of the femoral neck, as traditional anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopy is insufficient for visualizing the irregular anatomical structure of the femoral neck. We analysed the anatomy of the femoral neck to ascertain the optimal position and angle of the C-arm for adequate visualization of the femoral neck during fluoroscopy.
methodsThe femoral neck was divided into anterior, posterosuperior and posteroinferior surfaces. These surfaces and the coronal plane of the femur formed the anterior surface coronal angle (ACA), posterosuperior surface coronal angle (PSCA) and posteroinferior surface coronal angle (PICA), respectively. Three angles of 32 dried femoral samples were measured. In the aluminium model, steel wires penetrated the femoral neck wall, whereas, in the wire model, three Kirschner wires penetrated the femoral neck wall. The C-arm was rotated 5° for a 0°-180° fluoroscopic view of each curved surface. Each specimen was imaged, totalling 111 frames. The optimal angle for fluoroscopic imaging of each surface was ascertained, and fluoroscopic features of the Kirschner wire penetrating the femoral neck cortex at three different angles on fluoroscopy and anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were observed.
resultsThe femoral neck is irregularly shaped and cylindrical, with the anterior surface longer than the posteroinferior surface. The ACA, PSCA and PICA were 31 ± 4.589°, 67.813 ± 5.052° and 168.688 ± 3.206°, respectively. The optimal angles for visualizing the anterior, posterosuperior and posteroinferior surfaces of the steel wire aluminium foil model under fluoroscopy were 30.781 ± 5.464°, 67.969 ± 3.721°, and 167.813 ± 4.319°, respectively. There was no significant difference in the measurements of the corresponding surface coronal angles (P > 0.05). Kirschner wires penetrating the femoral neck wall were difficult to visualize on traditional anteroposterior and lateral films. Increasing the angle to 30°, 70° or 170° for fluoroscopy allowed clear visualization of Kirschner wires penetrating the femoral cortex.
conclusionTraditional anteroposterior and lateral fluoroscopic views are insufficient for clear visualization of the true structure of the femoral neck. Additionally, increasing the angle to 30°, 70° or 170° for fluoroscopy allows observation of the fracture reduction quality from the anterior surface, posterosuperior surface and posteroinferior surface of the femoral neck and the damage to the corresponding cortical bone caused by internal fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.