SynthesisBMC cardiovascular disorders2024
Prognostic value of mechanical dyssynchrony in patients with heart failure: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Volumetric Reference Ranges for SPECT MPI Parameters and the Predictive Power of Dyssynchrony Parameters: A Cross-Sectional StudyCurrent medical imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHeart failure (HF) significantly impacts quality of life and healthcare systems worldwide. Assessing left ventricular mechanical dyssynchrony (LVMD) is crucial for understanding cardiac function and optimizing treatments like cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Phase analysis using gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) has shown promise in predicting outcomes, yet recent comprehensive reviews are lacking.
objectiveTo systematically assess the prognostic value of phase analysis by gated SPECT MPI in the HF population through a systematic review.
methodsWe conducted a systematic review by collecting studies from databases including PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Two reviewers independently performed study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Systematic reviews were conducted using Review Manager Software 5.4 and STATA 16.0.
resultsA total of 2004 patients from seven studies were included in our review and analysis. The systematic review indicated that patients with predetermined clinical events had higher PSD [MD = 6.45, 95% CI (5.83, 7.07), p < 0.00001] and PBW [MD = 7.91, 95% CI (5.64, 10.19), p < 0.00001]. The diagnosis of LVMD determined by PSD [HR = 1.05, 95% CI (1.01, 1.08), p = 0.007] was a strong predictor of endpoint events compared to PBW [HR = 1.95, 95% CI (0.48, 7.89), p = 0.35].
conclusionsThe analysis demonstrated that phase information obtained from gated SPECT MPI is of significant prognostic value in patients with heart dysfunction. It effectively enhances clinical risk models, providing reliable guidance for patient treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.