Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39587514›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

How power and knowledge hierarchies affect communication in intrapartum care: findings from public health facilities in two southern Indian districts.

Abha Rao, V Srinidhi, Baneen Karachiwala, Sanjana Santosh, Shreelata Rao Seshadri, Sophia Thomas, Sreeparna Chattopadhyay, Anuradha Sreevathsa, Gita Sen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Abha RaoRamalingaswami Centre on Equity and Social Determinants of Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bangalore, India. abha.rao@phfi.org.
V SrinidhiRamalingaswami Centre on Equity and Social Determinants of Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bangalore, India.
Baneen KarachiwalaRamalingaswami Centre on Equity and Social Determinants of Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bangalore, India.
Sanjana SantoshRamalingaswami Centre on Equity and Social Determinants of Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bangalore, India.
Shreelata Rao SeshadriRamalingaswami Centre on Equity and Social Determinants of Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bangalore, India.
Sophia ThomasRamalingaswami Centre on Equity and Social Determinants of Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bangalore, India.
Sreeparna ChattopadhyayFLAME University, Pune, India.
Anuradha SreevathsaRamalingaswami Centre on Equity and Social Determinants of Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bangalore, India.
Gita SenRamalingaswami Centre on Equity and Social Determinants of Health, Public Health Foundation of India, Bangalore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective communication is a key element of medical care; it can foster a warm interpersonal relationship, facilitate the exchange of information, and enable shared decision-making. In the context of obstetric care, it is associated with a range of positive clinical and social outcomes for mother and baby. Extant communication frameworks and respectful maternity care (RMC) guidelines emphasize the importance of effective communication during intrapartum care. Yet, studies conducted in Indian public health settings suggest that there are gaps in the implementation of RMC guidelines.

methodsAs part of a larger study on disrespect and abuse in Indian public hospitals, we studied the nature of communication in the intrapartum context and the extent to which it is respectful. The study is based on interviews with 29 providers across different levels of public health facilities. Interviews were translated, transcribed, and thematically coded. We examined codes related to communication to understand what kinds of communication occur during intrapartum care and the role played by knowledge and power hierarchies. We then considered their implications for RMC.

resultsWe identified four types of communication that occurred in the context of intrapartum care: (a) compassionate, to comfort and support the laboring woman, (b) factual, to obtain or provide information or updates, (c) prescriptive, to obtain consent and cooperation from the woman and her family members, and (d) defensive, to protect against accusations of poor care. Knowledge and power hierarchies operated differently in each type of communication, with prescriptive and defensive communication more likely to be disrespectful than others.

conclusionsOur findings suggest that successful implementation of RMC guidelines requires greater attention to knowledge and power hierarchies, and an understanding of the ways in which they operate in a clinical setting. Integrating this understanding into guidelines, medical education, training programmes, and interventions will facilitate effective and respectful communication during maternity care.

Indexed as

CommunicationAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHospitals, PublicHumansIndiaMaternal Health ServicesPower, PsychologicalPregnancyProfessional-Patient RelationsQualitative ResearchRespectCommunicationDisrespect & abuseIntrapartum careKnowledge hierarchyPower hierarchy

Identifiers

PMID39587514
PMCPMC11587590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.