Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39587506›Full record

Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024

Provider advice, pregnant persons' expectations, and actual gestational weight gain among United States military health care beneficiaries: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

Erin Solomon, Abby McPhail, Zoran Bursac, Melissa A Little, G Wayne Talcott, Rebecca A Krukowski

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03057808 (Gestational Weight Gain and Postpartum Weight Loss in Active Duty Women), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03057808 nacompletednot on this map

Gestational Weight Gain and Postpartum Weight Loss in Active Duty Women

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of TennesseeRan2017 to 2022Enrolled430ConditionsWeight Gain, Weight LossArmsGestational weight gain intervention, Postpartum weight loss intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erin SolomonDepartment of Psychology, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
Abby McPhailDepartment of Psychology, The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
Zoran BursacDepartment of Biostatistics, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
Melissa A LittleDepartment of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, PO Box 800765, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0765, USA.
G Wayne TalcottDepartment of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, PO Box 800765, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0765, USA.
Rebecca A KrukowskiDepartment of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, PO Box 800765, Charlottesville, VA, 22908-0765, USA. wae4mq@virginia.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9193-2783

Funding

Behavioral Weight Management for Pregnant and Postpartum Women in the MilitaryR01DK104872 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI HARE, MARION · 2016 to 2020
$3.3M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK104872NIH HHS R01 DK104872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHealthy gestational weight gain (GWG) is associated with improved pregnancy and delivery outcomes. Previous literature shows provider advice and expectations regarding GWG significantly associated with GWG outcomes. In this study, we explore the influence of these factors on GWG in a military population in this secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial. MATERIALS AND

methodsParticipants (N = 377) came from a completed randomized controlled trial focused on behavioral interventions for healthy GWG and/or postpartum weight loss among TRICARE beneficiaries. At baseline, participants filled out a 5-item questionnaire assessing provider advice and self-expectations for GWG. For the actual GWG primary outcome variable, we calculated the difference between the weight obtained in the first trimester and the weight obtained at 36 weeks of gestation. We used regression models to assess the predictive ability of expectations about GWG on actual GWG.

resultsParticipants with higher baseline BMIs were more likely to expect excessive GWG as defined by the National Academy of Medicine (NAM; Overweight: 46.3%, Obesity: 65.4%). Participants' expectations showed a significant association with actual GWG (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.29-3.41, p = 0.003). Most participants (64.7%) reported no provider advice about how much weight to gain during their pregnancy. Of those who did receive advice, 55.4% reported that it was within the NAM guidelines.

conclusionsThe study documented infrequent provider advice about GWG in a large sample of TRICARE beneficiaries (i.e., both active duty and non-active duty individuals) and supported an association between self-expectations and later actual GWG. Future studies might test strategies to increase/improve provider advice regarding GWG and to aid pregnant individuals in shaping and achieving their GWG expectations. CLINICAL

trial registrationThe trial was prospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03057808) on February 20, 2017.

Indexed as

Gestational Weight GainAdultBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansMilitary PersonnelObesityOverweightPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal CareSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesYoung AdultExpectancy effectsGestational weight gainMilitaryMixed methodsPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID39587506
PMCPMC11587572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.