Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39587471›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2024

Clonidine and dexmedetomidine for controlled hypotension during functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a comparative study.

Erick Namegabe Mugabo, Yvette Masime Kulimushi, Gregor Pollach, Rania Abdelazim Sabra, Ragab Saad Beltagy, Furaha Nzanzu Blaise Pascal

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Erick Namegabe MugaboDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Provincial General Referral Hospital of Bukavu, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Yvette Masime KulimushiDepartment of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Provincial General Referral Hospital of Bukavu, Bukavu, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Gregor PollachFaculté de Médecine, Département d'Anesthésie et Réanimation, Université Catholique du Graben de Butembo, Butembo, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Rania Abdelazim SabraDepartment of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Ragab Saad BeltagyDepartment of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Furaha Nzanzu Blaise PascalFaculté de Médecine, Département d'Anesthésie et Réanimation, Université Catholique du Graben de Butembo, Butembo, Democratic Republic of Congo. blaisepascal.furaha@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFunctional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is minimally invasive, ambulatory endoscopic surgical procedure usually performed in most paranasal sinus diseases. Controlled hypotension during anaesthesia (hypotensive anesthesia) improves surgical field visibility and reduces risk of injuring surrounding structures. Clonidine (C) and dexmedetomidine (D) are both used to reduce blood pressure and heart rate while maintaining tissue perfusion. This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of clonidine compared to dexmedetomidine for controlled hypotension during FESS.

methodsAfter ethical approval, 80 patients undergoing elective FESS were included in the study and randomly allocated to Group C or Group D. In Group C, 40 patients received intravenous clonidine with a loading dose of 3µg/Kg for 10 min and titrated maintenance dose of 0.4-0.8 µg/Kg/hour. In Group D patients received intravenous dexmedetomidine with a loading dose of 1µg/Kg for 10 min and titrated maintenance dose of 0.4-0.8µg/Kg/hour. The target was mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) between 55 and 65 mmHg and heart rate (HR) above 50 beats per minute. The primary outcome was blood loss. The secondary outcomes were surgical field quality assessed by Fromme Bezooart score, variations in MAP and HR intraoperatively, duration of surgery and anesthesia, and post-operative sedation assessed by Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS).

resultsDemographic data of both groups were comparable. The difference between both groups in terms of blood loss and surgical field quality was not statistically significant (p = 0.579, 1.000). MAP and HR were statistically significantly reduced to targeted level in both groups compared to baseline (p<0.001). Dexmedetomidine led to severe hypotension compared to clonidine, and the difference was statistically significant. Duration of return to baseline MAP and HR, duration of anesthesia and postoperative sedation were prolonged in group D compared to Group C.

conclusionClonidine and dexmedetomidine provided good to excellent quality of surgical field visibility to surgeons during FESS. Dexmedetomidine produce more hypotension and bradycardia compared to clonidine which may be preferable for controlled hypotension in the setting of ambulatory surgery. However, considering the small sample of this study which could not detect small but clinically differences between both drugs, there is a need for a much larger and multicenter study to confirm these findings.

trial registrationThis trial was retrospectively registered in the Pan African Clinical Registry (pactr.samrc, ac.za) on 15 August 2024 under trial number PACTR202408565688611.

Indexed as

ClonidineDexmedetomidineEndoscopyHypotension, ControlledAdultBlood Loss, SurgicalBlood PressureDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedParanasal SinusesClonidineDexmedetomidineClonidineControlled hypotensionDexmedetomidineEgyptFESS

Identifiers

PMID39587471
PMCPMC11587769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.