Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39587459›Full record

Observational studyUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2025

Prediction of vesicouterine adhesions by transvaginal sonographic sliding sign technique: validation study.

N Min, J van Keizerswaard, R H Visser, N B Burger, J W T Rake, J W M Aarts, T Van den Bosch, M Leonardi, J A F Huirne, R A de Leeuw

Abstract readObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Diagnostic Accuracy of Transvaginal Ultrasound for Detecting Pelvic Adhesions and Predicting Surgical Time in Benign Gynecologic Surgery.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Head-to-head prospective comparison of diagnostic accuracy of preoperative ultrasonography and MRI in patients undergoing surgery for deep endometriosis using #Enzian classification.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Observational
  3. Predicting bladder-to-uterine adhesions in patients undergoing hysterectomy using sliding-bladder sign technique with preoperative ultrasound: a diagnostic accuracy study.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

N MinAmsterdam University Medical Center, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0009-0008-2112-8210
J van KeizerswaardAmsterdam University Medical Center, location Amsterdam Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R H VisserAmsterdam University Medical Center, location Amsterdam Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
N B BurgerAmsterdam University Medical Center, location Amsterdam Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J W T RakeAmsterdam University Medical Center, location Amsterdam Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J W M AartsAmsterdam University Medical Center, location Amsterdam Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
T Van den BoschDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6777-5036
M LeonardiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5538-6906
J A F HuirneAmsterdam University Medical Center, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
R A de LeeuwAmsterdam University Medical Center, location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9344-7754

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAdhesions between the uterus, bladder and anterior abdominal wall are associated with clinical sequelae, including chronic pelvic pain and dyspareunia, and can also yield complications during surgery. The transvaginal sonographic (TVS) sliding bladder sign is a minimally invasive diagnostic tool to evaluate the presence of vesicouterine adhesions. This study aimed to determine the predictive value and intra- and interobserver variation of the TVS sliding bladder sign in the assessment of vesicouterine adhesions.

methodsThis was a prospective observational double-blind diagnostic accuracy study conducted at the Amsterdam University Medical Center. Patients scheduled for gynecological laparoscopic surgery for a benign disorder between January 2020 and December 2022 were included consecutively. All patients underwent preoperative TVS, including a dynamic sliding bladder sign examination in our outpatient clinic. Videoclips of the TVS scans were stored for offline assessment and used as an index test. The recordings of both TVS and laparoscopy were evaluated for diagnostic characteristics of vesicouterine adhesions by independent assessors, who were blinded to the clinical situation in addition to the laparoscopic findings when assessing recordings of TVS and vice versa. The presence of adhesions on laparoscopy was used as the reference standard. The positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), specificity and sensitivity of the sliding bladder sign were calculated. In addition, inter- and intraobserver variability of the sliding bladder sign on TVS were assessed.

resultsOf 116 included women, 57 had a negative sliding bladder sign on TVS, while on laparoscopy, 51 women had mild and 28 had severe vesicouterine adhesions. A negative sliding bladder sign had a PPV of 94.7% (95% CI, 88.9-100%) for the presence of any vesicouterine adhesions, and a positive sliding bladder sign had a specificity of 91.9% (95% CI, 83.1-100%). For severe adhesions, the negative sliding bladder sign had a sensitivity of 89.3% (95% CI, 77.8-100%) and a positive sliding bladder sign had a NPV of 94.9% (95% CI, 89.3-100%). When using Cohen's kappa coefficient, inter- and intraobserver agreement between assessors was good.

conclusionsSliding bladder sign evaluation using TVS is a reliable diagnostic tool for the prediction of vesicouterine adhesions on laparoscopy. A negative sliding bladder sign indicates the presence of vesicouterine adhesions, while a positive sliding bladder sign makes the presence of severe adhesions unlikely. Establishing vesicouterine adhesions by TVS may optimize preoperative planning, and can be used for future studies to evaluate the relationship between symptomatology and vesicouterine adhesions and, subsequently, the effect of adhesion-prevention interventions. © 2024 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

Predictive Value of TestsTissue AdhesionsUltrasonographyUrinary BladderUterusAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMiddle AgedObserver VariationProspective StudiesReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityUrinary Bladder Diseasesadhesiondiagnostic imagingsliding signtransvaginal sonographyurinary bladderuterus

Identifiers

PMID39587459
PMCPMC11693815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.