Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39587424›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2024

Starch intake and caries increment: A longitudinal study in Finnish adults.

Fariah H Jangda, Annaliisa L Suominen, Annamari Lundqvist, Satu Männistö, Ali Golkari, Eduardo Bernabé

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Fariah H JangdaInstitute of Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Annaliisa L SuominenInstitute of Dentistry, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Annamari LundqvistNational Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Satu MännistöNational Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Ali GolkariInstitute of Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Eduardo BernabéInstitute of Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1858-3713

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate whether changes in starch intake (in terms of amount and food sources) were associated with increments in dental caries among adults.

designThis is an 11-year longitudinal study (2000-2011) with duplicate assessments for all variables. A 128-item FFQ was used to estimate intake of starch (g/d) and six starch-rich food groups (potatoes, potato products, roots and tubers, pasta, wholegrains and legumes). Dental caries was assessed through clinical examinations and summarised using the number of decayed, missing and filled teeth (DMFT score). The relationship between quintiles of starch intake and DMFT score was tested in linear hybrid models adjusting for confounders.

settingNorthern and Southern regions of Finland.

participants922 adults, aged 30-88 years.

resultsMean starch intake was 127·6 (sd: 47·8) g/d at baseline and 120·7 (55·8) g/d at follow-up. Mean DMFT score was 21·7 (6·4) and 22·4 (6·2) at baseline and follow-up. Starch intake was inversely associated with DMFT score cross-sectionally (rate ratio for highest

conclusionChanges in the amount and sources of starch intake were not associated with changes in dental caries. Further studies should be conducted in different settings and age groups while focusing on starch digestibility and specific sources of starch.

Indexed as

Dental CariesStarchAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCross-Sectional StudiesDietDMF IndexFemaleFinlandHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedStarchAdultCarbohydratesDental cariesFinlandLongitudinal studyStarch

Identifiers

PMID39587424
PMCPMC11705017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.