Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39587320›Full record

ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2025

Wheat field earthworms under divergent farming systems across a European climate gradient.

Visa Nuutinen, Maria J I Briones, Stefan Schrader, Igor Dekemati, Nikola Grujić, Juha Hyvönen, Mari Ivask, Simon Bo Lassen, Eva Lloret, Irene Ollio and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Wheat field earthworms under divergent farming systems across a European climate gradient.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Visa NuutinenSoil Ecosystems, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Jokioinen, Finland.
Maria J I BrionesDepartamento de Ecología y Biología Animal, Universidade de Vigo, Vigo, Spain.
Stefan SchraderInstitute of Biodiversity, Thünen Institute, Braunschweig, Germany.
Igor DekematiDepartment of Agronomy, Institute of Crop Production Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllö, Hungary.
Nikola GrujićDepartment for Entomology and Agricultural Zoology, Institute for Phytomedicine, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Belgrade, Belgrade-Zemun, Serbia.
Juha HyvönenApplied Statistical Methods, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Rovaniemi, Finland.
Mari IvaskInstitute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia.
Simon Bo LassenDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Eva LloretSustainable Use, Management and Reclamation of Soil and Water Research Group (GARSA), Department of Agricultural Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Cartagena, Spain.
Irene OllioSustainable Use, Management and Reclamation of Soil and Water Research Group (GARSA), Department of Agricultural Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Cartagena, Spain.
Paula Pérez-RodríguezSection for Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Department of Plant Biology and Soil Science, Universidade de Vigo, Ourense, Spain.
Barbara SimonDepartment of Soil Science, Institute of Environmental Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Gödöllö, Hungary.
Merit SutriInstitute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia.
Nancy de SutterILVO (Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food), Plant Sciences Unit, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Kristian K BrandtDepartment of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Krista PeltoniemiSoil Ecosystems, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Helsinki, Finland.
Merrit ShanskiyInstitute of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Estonian University of Life Sciences, Tartu, Estonia.
Lieven WaeyenbergeILVO (Flanders Research Institute for Agriculture, Fisheries and Food), Plant Sciences Unit, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Silvia Martínez-MartínezSustainable Use, Management and Reclamation of Soil and Water Research Group (GARSA), Department of Agricultural Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena, Cartagena, Spain.
David Fernández-CalviñoSection for Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, Department of Plant Biology and Soil Science, Universidade de Vigo, Ourense, Spain.

Funding

European Union's H2020 program 817819
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Earthworms are a key faunal group in agricultural soils, but little is known on how farming systems affect their communities across wide climatic gradients and how farming system choice might mediate earthworms' exposure to climate conditions. Here, we studied arable soil earthworm communities on wheat fields across a European climatic gradient, covering nine pedo-climatic zones, from Mediterranean to Boreal (S to N) and from Lusitanian to Pannonian (W to E). In each zone, 20-25 wheat fields under conventional or organic farming were sampled. Community metrics (total abundance, fresh mass, and species richness and composition) were combined with data on climate conditions, soil properties, and field management and analyzed with mixed models. There were no statistically discernible differences between organic and conventional farming for any of the community metrics. The effects of refined arable management factors were also not detected, except for an elevated proportion of subsurface-feeding earthworms when crop residues were incorporated. Soil properties were not significantly associated with earthworm community variations, which in the case of soil texture was likely due to low variation in the data. Pedo-climatic zone was an overridingly important factor in explaining the variation in community metrics. The Boreal zone had the highest mean total abundance (179 individuals m

Indexed as

AgricultureClimateOligochaetaTriticumAnimalsEuropeSoilSoilarable fieldsclimate changefarming systemsglobal warmingmacrofaunaorganic farmingregional distributionssoil biodiversity

Identifiers

PMID39587320
PMCPMC11734576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.