Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39587311›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2024

Engaging youth in biodiversity education through visual narrative.

Kyra Ricci, Kathleen Lu, Grascen Shidemantle, Jessica Hua

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Engaging youth in biodiversity education through visual narrative.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kyra RicciDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6544-5156
Kathleen LuDepartment of Biological Sciences, Binghamton University, Binghamton, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8377-7821
Grascen ShidemantleCommunity Science Institute, Ithaca, New York, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3002-1406
Jessica HuaDepartment of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9553-902X

Funding

National Science Foundation 2137424National Science Foundation 2314625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engaging youth in early and sustained conservation education has important implications for promoting positive attitudes and behaviors in those who will become the future of conservation and management. Toward this goal, visual narratives (comic books, graphic novels) are an increasingly popular method used by conservation scientists to educate young people due to their approachable use of art and narrative storytelling. However, no studies have directly assessed how visual narratives compare with more traditional forms of conservation education for youth. We asked, how does education about biodiversity through visual narrative affect student perceptions and knowledge of science content relative to a traditional resource, and is there a novelty effect when using visual narrative versus traditional resources? To assess our questions, we utilized a semistructured approach to develop a biodiversity education program. Specifically, we developed an original graphic novel (visual narrative treatment) and a slideshow presentation (traditional treatment) with the same content to educate children about wetland biodiversity. We recruited, trained, and randomized 26 third-grade teachers to deliver either the visual narrative or traditional resource in their classrooms. Students completed pretest, posttest, and follow-up surveys assessing their perceptions of science and knowledge of the lesson content. Students in the visual narrative treatment held more positive perceptions of science (by 3.79%, p = 0.001), whereas students in the traditional treatment performed better on content quizzes (by 7.97%, p = 0.002). We found evidence for a novelty bias when using the visual narrative but not the traditional resource. These findings point to the importance of understanding the target audience and clearly defining educational goals. Overall, our results contribute to broader understanding of the relative benefits and limitations of conservation education through nontraditional means and of practices for successfully delivering effective, accessible, and rewarding conservation education to educators and youth.

Indexed as

BiodiversityConservation of Natural ResourcesNarrationChildFemaleHumansMaleStudentsWetlandsamphibiansanfibiosarte ambientalarte científicoarte visualcomunicación ambientaleducación ambientaleducación científicaenvironmental artenvironmental communicationenvironmental educationnarrativa visualscience artscience educationvisual artvisual narrative两栖动物环境交流环境教育环境艺术科学教育科学艺术视觉叙事视觉艺术

Identifiers

PMID39587311
PMCPMC11588992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.