ArticleScientific reports2024
Impact of the mental health law revision restricting hospitalization on healthcare utilization in South Korea using interrupted time series analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Navigating Professional Growth and Constraint Through Clinical Supervision: A Qualitative Study of Community Mental Health Nurse Specialists in South Korea.International journal of mental health nursing · 2026Article
- Changes in usual source of care utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparative analysis by chronic disease status.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- The Impact of the "Healthy China 2030" planning outline strategy on the development of China's medical and health resources-based on interrupted time series analysis from 1990 to 2023.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Continuous Flumazenil Infusion and Time to Consciousness Recovery in Benzodiazepine Poisoning: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To reduce long hospitalization durations and the high rate of compulsory psychiatric hospitalization in Korea, a revision of the Mental Health Welfare law was passed and implemented in 2017. This study quantitatively analyzed changes in hospitalization use behavior of patients with psychotic and mood disorders after revision of the Mental Health Welfare law in South Korea. The intervention time was June 2017. Data from the National Health Insurance claims were used. Participants were all patients with hospital visits involving psychotic disorders and mood disorders. We used the interrupted time-series method with segmented regression. In patients with psychotic disorders, admission decreased after the law revision. The average inpatient length of hospitalization decreased immediately after the revision, leading to a long-term decrease. Emergency room visits increased following the revision, and admission through the emergency room also increased. In patients with mood disorders, admission decreased both immediately and over the long-term after the revision. Additionally, the average inpatient length of hospitalization decreased immediately, with no significant change observed in the long term. Emergency room visits increased following the revision. Following the law revision, patients with psychiatric disorders showed a decrease in hospital admissions and length of hospital stay. However, an increasing trend in emergency room visits was identified, suggesting an increase in crisis situations. These findings indicate the need to reduce admissions and length of hospitalization while also protecting the rights of patients with psychiatric disorders. System improvements are thus necessary to prevent an increase in crisis situations and ensure appropriate treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.