Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39587230›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A novel dual-staining method for cost-effective visualization and differentiation of microbial biofilms.

B Nirmala, Prem Lata Manhas, Mohit Jadli, Ritika Sharma, Hardeep Manhas, Balram Ji Omar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

B NirmalaDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Rishikesh, 249203, Uttarakhand, India.
Prem Lata ManhasDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Rishikesh, 249203, Uttarakhand, India.
Mohit JadliMultidisciplinary Research Unit, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, India.
Ritika SharmaDepartment of Pediatrics, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Hardeep ManhasDepartment of Design, Indian Institute of Technology (IIT), Roorkee, Uttarakhand, India.
Balram Ji OmarDepartment of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), Rishikesh, 249203, Uttarakhand, India. balram.micro@aiimsrishikesh.edu.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbial biofilms are intricate communities that pose significant challenges in clinical and microbiological settings due to their resistance to antibiotics and immune responses. Advanced microscopy techniques, such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM), and fluorescence microscopy, are often employed to visualize and differentiate between these biofilms. However, these methods are not feasible in all laboratories because of their high cost and complexity. In contrast, simpler techniques like crystal violet and Congo red staining fail to differentiate bacterial cells from the biofilm matrix. This study introduces a novel dual-staining method using Maneval's stain for microbial biofilm detection and differentiation. This simple, cost-effective method requires only basic equipment and minimal reagents, making it suitable for routine use across various settings. We applied the dual-staining method to various microbial species, including Staphylococcus aureus, Enterococcus faecalis, Candida albicans, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. When compared with the microtiter plate assay, results showed strong agreement, with the dual-staining method effectively differentiating between bacterial cells and the surrounding biofilm matrix, displaying a distinctive blue polysaccharide layer surrounding the magenta‒red bacterial cells. This technique offers a viable alternative to more expensive and complex biofilm detection methods, with potential applications in clinical diagnostics and biofilm research.

Indexed as

BiofilmsStaining and LabelingBacteriaCandida albicansCost-Benefit AnalysisEnterococcus faecalisEscherichia coliHumansMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningPseudomonas aeruginosaStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID39587230
PMCPMC11589826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.