ArticleScientific reports2024
A multicenter study on the sex difference of dysfunctions among rehabilitation outpatients in China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of the clinicians' and experts' assessments of rehabilitation service needs for patients in the middle of China.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dysfunction is a common clinical symptom among rehabilitation patients; however, whether there are sex differences in dysfunctions remains unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to explore this issue by examining a large sample of the population with dysfunctional problems. A multi-stage sampling scheme was used to select the rehabilitation outpatients as study participants. A total of 3415 participants from 21 medical institutions in seven cities in China were included in the final analysis. The measurement included general characteristics (age, sex, educational level, marital status, and household income) and disease-related characteristics (dysfunctions, self-care ability, vital signs, disease status, and disease course). The logistic regression was used to analyse the sex difference in dysfunctions among rehabilitation outpatients. Among 3415 rehabilitation outpatients, the mean age of participants was 45.3 years (SD:24.9), and more than half (54.0%) were male. The male patients were more likely to have cognitive impairment (OR = 1.74; 95% CI = 1.42, 2.13), speech disorders (OR = 2.00; 95% CI = 1.62, 2.48), dysphagia (OR = 1.55; 95% CI = 1.12, 2.16), and multiple dysfunctions (OR = 2.00; 95% CI = 1.57, 2.54) than female. Female patients were more likely to have motor dysfunctions (OR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.50, 0.78). There are sex differences in dysfunctions among rehabilitation outpatients. This sex difference may provide potential clinical value for the treatment of rehabilitation patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.