ArticleScientific reports2024
Depression screening model for middle-aged and elderly diabetic patients in China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning-based risk predictive models for depression in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Development and Validation of a Risk Screening Model for Depressive Symptoms in Older Inpatients: A Cross-Sectional Study.Clinical interventions in aging · 2026Article
- Brain insulin resistance: a key pathological hub linking metabolic and neuropsychiatric comorbidities.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Review
- Occupational and psychosocial risk factors for depression among uninsured middle-aged food delivery riders.BMC psychology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes is a common global disease closely associated with an increased risk of depression. This study analyzed China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS) data to examine depression in diabetic patients across China. using 29 variables including demographic, behavioral, health conditions, and mental health parameters. The dataset was randomly divided into a 70% training set and a 30% validation set. Predictive factors significantly associated with depression were identified using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and logistic regression analysis. A nomogram model was constructed using these predictive factors. The model evaluation included the C-index, calibration curves, the Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and DCA. Depression prevalence was 39.1% among diabetic patients. Multifactorial logistic regression identified significant predictors including gender, permanent address, self-perceived health status, presence of lung disease, arthritis, memory disorders, life satisfaction, cognitive function score, ADL score, and social activity. The nomogram model showed high consistency and accuracy, with AUC values of 0.802 for the training set and 0.812 for the validation set. Both sets showed good model fit with Hosmer-Lemeshow P > 0.05. Calibration curves showed significant consistency between the nomogram model and actual observations. ROC and DCA indicated that the nomogram had a good predictive performance. The nomogram developed in this study effectively assesses depression risk in diabetic patients, helping clinicians identify high-risk individuals. This tool could potentially improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.