ArticleScientific reports2024
A retrospective single-center study of transnasal ileus tube insertion accompanied with cap-assisted endoscopic advancement for malignant adhesive bowel obstruction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Efficacy of Intestinal Obstruction Catheter Combined with Modified Dachengqi Decoction in Elderly Patients with Early Postoperative Inflammatory Intestinal Obstruction: A Randomised Study.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate the effectiveness of cap-assisted endoscope synchronous advancement and tube direction adjustment for inserting transnasal ileus tubes in patients with malignant adhesive bowel obstruction (MABO). 25 patients with cap-assisted endoscopic synchronous method (Group A, Dec 2023-Apr 2024) were reviewed retrospectively. Accordingly, those with forceps-grasping method (Group B: 27, Aug 2022-Nov 2023) were included as controls. Both groups were similar in terms of age, sex, primary tumor, doctor experience distribution and technical success rate. The proportion of gynecological cancers was the highest in either group. The time required for insertion was shorter in Group A than in Group B (5 vs. 12 min; P = 0.000). Group A also had slightly longer tube insertion length than Group B (129.8 ± 14.1 vs. 121.3 ± 12.0 cm; P = 0.008), and the remission rate of intestinal obstruction symptoms in Group A was similar to that in Group B (75.0% vs. 74.1%; P = 0.940). There were no significant differences in complications between the two groups. One patient suffered MABO recurrence 14 days after withdrawal of the tube. Our findings indicate that transnasal ileus tube insertion with cap-assisted endoscopic synchronous method took shorter time and had the same rate of technical success and advantage of decompression compared with forceps-grasping method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.