ArticleScientific reports2024
A biocompatible supramolecular hydrogel mesh for sample stabilization in light microscopy and nanoscopy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hydrogels in medicine and biotechnology.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- DNA-PAINT Imaging with Hydrogel Imprinting and Clearing.ACS sensors · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most embedding media for live and fixed samples were not designed for microscopy and have issues including long polymerization times, peak of toxicity toward the sample during the sol-gel transition, and irreversibility of this transition. Gels derived from biological sources are widely used in microscopy, but their precise composition is ill-defined and can vary between batches. Non-physiological temperatures and/or specific enzymatic solutions are often needed to revert the gel back to the sol state to allow sample recovery. Recovering the sample undamaged is important for multiple purposes, from the ability to release a living organism back into its environment and re-observe it at a later stage, to interrogating the sample once freed from the gel after imaging. We describe a supramolecular hydrogel that enables the observation of small living organisms using light microscopy, with simple sample recovery through vigorous pipetting with water. The organisms can be recovered alive and capable of further development into adulthood, which represents a significant advancement, as most other matrices require release conditions such as heating, the addition of chemicals, or mechanical disruption, which can damage or kill the embedded organisms. Furthermore, the gel is compatible with super-resolution multi-colour STED nanoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.