Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39587152›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Comparison of grip strength measurements for predicting all-cause mortality among adults aged 20+ years from the NHANES 2011-2014.

Lirong Chai, Dongfeng Zhang, Junning Fan

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Adolescent IQ and performance-based measures of physical function in old age: a 54-year longitudinal study.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  15. What Is 'Muscle Health'? A Narrative Review and Conceptual Framework.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lirong ChaiDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, 308 Ningxia Road, Qingdao, 266071, China.
Dongfeng ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, 308 Ningxia Road, Qingdao, 266071, China.
Junning FanDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Qingdao University, 308 Ningxia Road, Qingdao, 266071, China. fanjunning219@163.com.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation 2023M731839Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province ZR2023QH188Qingdao Postdoctoral Innovation Project QDBSH20230102012Qingdao University Scientific Research Startup Fund DC2200002531
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the optimal measure of handgrip strength for predicting all-cause mortality and whether this association is modified by age or sex. We used data from the 2011-2014 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 9,583 adults aged ≥ 20 years were included. Equal-length grip strength was measured using a digital handheld Takei dynamometer. We defined five measurements of grip strength, i.e., the average of handgrip strength (HGS), maximum of grip strength (MGS), HGS/body mass index (BMI), HGS/height (HT)

Indexed as

Hand StrengthNutrition SurveysAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBody Mass IndexCause of DeathFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMortalityYoung AdultAll-cause mortalityGrip strengthInteractionsOptimal measurement index

Identifiers

PMID39587152
PMCPMC11589676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.