ArticleScientific reports2024
An approach based on ecosystem services for assessing progress towards sustainable development goals at both national and provincial levels in China.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ecosystem services (ESs), the benefits nature provides to people, are an important basis for fulfilling sustainable development goals (SDGs). Therefore, an ES-based approach will help deepen our understanding of the relationships between natural systems and human well-being and provide co-benefit pathways for sustainable development. However, monitoring progress towards achieving the SDGs based on the contributions of ESs to SDGs is lacking. Using the linkages between ESs and SDGs, this study quantified progress towards the SDGs in China from 2000 to 2020 and determined future development priorities at both the national and provincial levels. Our results indicated that (1) during the period 2000-2020, China showed decreasing trends in the 11 SDGs and SDG index scores; (2) there were significant differences in the scores for SDGs and the SDG index across 31 provinces; (3) SDG 3, SDG6, SDG11, SDG13, and SDG15 were recognized as the highest national priorities, concerning health and environment; and (4) 31 provinces faced diverse economic, social, and environmental development challenges. The ES-based approach may assist policy-makers in monitoring and comparing progress towards the SDGs in an integrated and composite way, prioritizing local action, and providing a scientific basis for formulating policies to achieve SDG implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.