ArticleScientific reports2024
Research on local path planning of unmanned vehicles based on improved driving risk field.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Construction of dynamic trafficability map for unmanned vehicles considering multiple environmental factors and path planning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
With the rapid development of the field of unmanned vehicles, motion planning based on field theory has become a research hotspot. A driving risk field is an effective means to evaluate driving safety in complex environments, and this method is frequently used in autonomous vehicle motion planning. However, existing risk field models are not sufficiently accurate for describing driving risks, often disregarding the size and driving direction restrictions of vehicles, amongst other aspects. Considering the aforementioned problems, this research improves and establishes a new risk field model, including a motor vehicle risk field, a road risk field and a pedestrian risk field. Simultaneously, it proposes a solution to the local minimum point problem caused by different scenarios and verifies the simulation in MATLAB. Finally, the Prescan and MATLAB/Simulink co-simulation platform is used to compare the traditional and improved field theory algorithms. Results show that the trajectory generated by the improved field theory algorithm is smoother, and the fluctuation amplitude and number of parameters, such as heading angle, yaw rate and roll angle during driving, are significantly reduced. These outcomes improve the stability of driving whilst smoothly reaching the target point, demonstrating high application potential for the proposed model.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.