ArticleScientific reports2024
Importance of fluorescein angiography as a predictor of treatment response in patients with pachychoroid neovasculopathy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fluorescein Angiography Leakage Patterns in Pachychoroid Neovasculopathy: Neovascularization or Central Serous Chorioretinopathy?Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Choroidal neovascularization as a trigger for central serous chorioretinopathy.International journal of retina and vitreous · 2025Article
- Predictive Factors for Morphological and Functional Improvements in Long-Lasting Central Serous Chorioretinopathy Treated with Photodynamic Therapy.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Predictive factors for the efficacy of brolucizumab in refractory polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy following aflibercept resistance.PloS one · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the treatment outcomes of patients with pachychoroid neovasculopathy (PNV) who received photodynamic therapy (PDT) combined with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents, with a particular focus on the fluorescein angiography (FA) findings. We retrospectively studied 33 eyes of 32 consecutive treatment-naïve patients with PNV who were scheduled for PDT combined with anti-VEGF agents between November 2017 and May 2022, with a follow-up period of 1 year or longer. We classified patients into two groups: central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC)-dominant type and macular neovascularization (MNV)-dominant type based on the baseline FA findings. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was compared before treatment and at 3, 6, and 12 months after the initial treatment. Additionally, recurrence rate, and number of additional injections during the maintenance phase were assessed. We classified 19 eyes with the CSC-dominant type, and 14 eyes with the MNV-dominant type. The BCVA improved significantly 1 year after the initial treatment only in the CSC-dominant type (P = 0.001). The recurrence rate in the maintenance phase was lower in the CSC-dominant type (15.8%) compared to the MNV-dominant type (57.1%), a difference that reached significance (P = 0.024).This study highlights the distinct treatment outcomes between the CSC-dominant and MNV-dominant types; specifically, CSC-dominant type had better visual improvement and a lower recurrence rate than the MNV-dominant type. These differences underscore the potential of FA as a useful biomarker to predict visual outcomes and recurrence in the maintenance phase in patients with PNV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.