Articlenpj aging2024
Predicting poor performance on cognitive tests among older adults using wearable device data and machine learning: a feasibility study.
Article in npj aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- AI and Wearables for Early Detection of Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Maternal prenatal co-exposure to air pollution and psychological distress shapes the neonatal gut: microbiota-mediated pathways to early neurodevelopment.Gut microbes · 2026Article
- From Fitness to Cognition: Machine-Learning Prediction of Cognitive Performance Using Physiological Parameters in Healthy Adults.Medicine and science in sports and exercise · 2026Article
- Wearable sensing for quantifying cognitive and balance functions in naturalistic movements of older adults with mild cognitive impairment in therapeutic environments.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Multidomain prediction of education-stratified MoCA-defined mild cognitive impairment in community-dwelling older adults in urban China.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Determining Cluster-Specific Differences in the Number of Days Required to Reliably Predict Habitual Physical Activity: Intraclass Correlation Resampling Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- Multimodal data-driven eye-movement subtypes and their cerebral glucose metabolic patterns in Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2026Article
- Wearable Technologies for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention in Older Adults: Systematic Scoping Review and Evidence Map.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Quantifying Mild Cognitive Impairments in Older Adults Using Multi-modal Wearable Sensor Data in a Kitchen Environment.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Associations of social isolation with memory and cognitive function in middle-aged and older Chinese adults.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025Article
- Interpretable machine learning for cognitive impairment prediction in Parkinson's disease: a multicenter validation study with SHAP analysis.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Timely implementation of interventions to slow cognitive decline among older adults requires accurate monitoring to detect changes in cognitive function. Factors known to be associated with cognition that can be gathered from accelerometers, user interfaces, and other sensors within wearable devices could be used to train machine learning models and develop wearable-based cognitive monitoring systems. Using data from over 2400 older adults in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) we developed prediction models to differentiate older adults with normal cognition from those with poor cognition based on outcomes from three cognitive tests measuring different domains of cognitive function. During repeated cross-validation CatBoost, XGBoost, and Random Forest models performed best when predicting poor cognition based on tests measuring processing speed, working memory, and attention (median AUCs ≥0.82) compared to immediate and delayed recall (median AUCs ≥0.72) and categorical verbal fluency (median AUC ≥ 0.68). Activity and sleep parameters were also more strongly associated with poor cognition based on tests assessing processing speed, working memory, and attention compared to other cognitive subdomains. Our work provides proof of concept that data collatable through wearable devices such as age, education, sleep parameters, activity summaries, and light exposure metrics could be used to differentiate between older adults with normal versus poor cognition. We further identified metrics that could be targets in future causal studies seeking to better understand how sleep and activity parameters influence cognitive function among older adults.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.