Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39587112›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Differences in ongoing thought between autistic and non-autistic adults.

Will H Strawson, Brontë Mckeown, Lisa Quadt, Hao-Ting Wang, Dennis E O Larrson, James Mulcahy, Marta Silva, Christina Kampoureli, Adam Turnbull, Sarah N Garfinkel and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Will H StrawsonDepartment of Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School (BSMS), University of Sussex, Brighton, UK. w.strawson@sussex.ac.uk.
Brontë MckeownDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Lisa QuadtDepartment of Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School (BSMS), University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Hao-Ting WangLaboratory for Brain Simulation and Exploration (SIMEXP), Montreal Geriatrics Institute (CRIUGM), University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
Dennis E O LarrsonDepartment of Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School (BSMS), University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
James MulcahyDepartment of Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School (BSMS), University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Marta SilvaInstitute of Neurosciences, University of Barcelona, Catalunya, Spain.
Christina KampoureliDepartment of Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School (BSMS), University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Adam TurnbullCogT Lab, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Sarah N GarfinkelInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.
Jonathan SmallwoodDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Hugo D CritchleyDepartment of Neuroscience, Brighton and Sussex Medical School (BSMS), University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autistic people may be distinguishable from non-autistic individuals in the content and modality of their thoughts. Such differences potentially underlie both psychological vulnerability and strengths, motivating the need to better understand autistic thought patterns. In non-clinical undergraduates, a recent study found that autistic traits were associated with thinking more in words than images. However, it is unclear whether such differences in thought are present in clinically diagnosed autistic individuals. The current study applied the same methods (multidimensional experience sampling during an N-back task) to examine ongoing thought in autistic and non-autistic adults. We found that autistic individuals showed less variability in the modality of their thoughts between easy and difficult task contexts. While both non-autistic and autistic participants tended to report thinking more in words during the difficult task context, the difference between conditions was significantly smaller for the autistic group. In addition, autistic individuals showed a weaker coupling between task performance and off-task social thinking, a finding that may be related to differences in social processing during the off-task state. Overall, our results provide a clinical replication and extension of previous work, highlighting the differential effects of changing external context on internal mental states in autism.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderThinkingAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID39587112
PMCPMC11589611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.