Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39587030›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2024

Using positionality and reflexivity to support equity in partnership-driven research.

Rachael Cadman, Alanna Syliboy, Michelle Saunders, Shelley Denny, Mary Denniston, Eleanor Barry, Breanna Bishop, Shannon Landovskis, Megan Bailey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Using positionality and reflexivity to support equity in partnership-driven research.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rachael CadmanMarine Affairs Program, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6463-960X
Alanna SyliboyMi'kmaw Conservation Group, The Confederacy of Mainland Mi'kmaq, Truro, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Michelle SaundersNunatsiavut Government, Nain, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Shelley DennyUnama'ki Institute of Natural Resources, Eskasoni, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Mary DennistonNunatsiavut Government, Nain, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Eleanor BarryDepartment of Ocean Sciences, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada.
Breanna BishopMarine Affairs Program, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Shannon LandovskisOcean Tracking Network, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Megan BaileyMarine Affairs Program, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social and economic position and power shape everyone, including scientists and researchers. The way researchers do conservation science and the voices centered in the process are a result of researcher upbringing, experiences, access to resources, and values and are a manifestation of positionality. Positionality is a concept that can help one think about one's position and power in one's work. Creating a successful research partnership requires careful thinking about how equity, diversity, inclusivity, and accessibility are accounted for in the research environment. We drew on our own experiences as early career, mid-career, and Indigenous researchers to explore researcher positionality and how understanding one's positionality can bring to the fore power dynamics in conservation science and research. We focused on the use of reflexive practice to recognize diverse roles and responsibilities, build strong project governance, and enrich relationships. We considered 2 large research partnerships, Apoqnmatulti'k (Mi'kmaw for we help each other) and the SakKijânginnaniattut Nunatsiavut Sivunitsangit (Inuttitut for Sustainable Nunatsiavut Futures) project, to examine moments of tension and interrogation of power and the ways in which this interrogation led to stronger relationships and better research. We advise that large transdisciplinary and cross-cultural research teams use positionality and reflexivity to explicitly make choices about power dynamics in the context of executing partnership-driven work. This can be accomplished through personal and collective interrogation of the power dynamics at play in project administration, research questions, and interpersonal relationships.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesCooperative BehaviorResearchResearch PersonnelHumansMi'kmakiNunatsiavutproject governancereflexive methodsresearch sovereignty努纳齐亚武特地区反思性方法研究主权米克马克项目管理

Identifiers

PMID39587030
PMCPMC11588975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.