Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39587029›Full record

ArticleConservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology2024

Shifting paradigms and creating space for Indigenous leadership in biosecurity management and decision-making.

Tracey Godfery, John Kean, Daniel Hikuroa, Andrew Robinson, Nari Williams

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Leading with courage and integrity in the National Science Challenges.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2025
    Article
  2. Shifting paradigms and creating space for Indigenous leadership in biosecurity management and decision-making.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tracey GodferySchool of Biological Sciences, Waipapa Taumata Rau - University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-0955-3563
John KeanAgResearch Limited, Ruakura Research Centre, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Daniel HikuroaFaculty of Arts, Māori Studies, Te Wānanga o Waipapa, Waipapa Taumata Rau - University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Andrew RobinsonSchool of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Nari WilliamsPlant and Food Research, Havelock North, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In New Zealand, awareness regarding protection, enhancement, and regeneration of landscapes and biodiversity is growing as the relationship between functioning and diverse ecosystems and society's health is acknowledged. This relationship is especially important for Indigenous people, who hold strong genealogical and familial ties with nature. Significant biodiversity loss from anthropogenic factors is exacerbated by climate change, ecosystem degradation, and invasive species. Invasive species and other biological threats, such as native pathogens, are concerning for Māori communities, who hold cultural responsibilities to care for nature. Despite acknowledgment of the value of Indigenous perspectives in environmental management in New Zealand and globally, Indigenous participation still largely occurs within Western non-Indigenous paradigms. We highlight the value of Indigenous participation in biosecurity management and propose a shift from Western-based paradigms to paradigms that reflect Indigenous worldviews and relationships with place. Recognizing and including the value of Indigenous participation elevates Indigenous voices to the level of decision-making and leadership in the management of Indigenous lands. Given the genealogical relationships that Māori hold with the natural world and the intertwining of their health and well-being with that of place (land) and nature, biosecurity threats to native species and ecosystems also pose serious risks to community well-being. A holistic biosecurity approach is needed that encompasses cultural, social, economic, and environmental factors at multiple scales. We examined the New Zealand biosecurity context relative to biological threats to native plants and ecosystems and proposed a paradigm shift toward Indigenous place-based biosecurity management. Biosecurity science and science-based tools remain an important component, underscoring the complementary aspects of science and (Indigenous) culture.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesDecision MakingLeadershipBiodiversityBiosecurityHumansIndigenous PeoplesNew Zealandbiosecurity managementcontrasting worldviewsgestión de la bioseguridadIndigenous paradigmsnature relationshipsparadigmas indígenasrelaciones con la naturalezavisiones contrastantes土著人民的范式截然不同的世界观生物安全管理自然关系

Identifiers

PMID39587029
PMCPMC11589068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.