Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39587011›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in behavioral neurosciences2025

Interoceptive Processing in Substance Use Disorders (SUDs): From the Neuroanatomy to Insights from Computational Models and Predictive Coding Frameworks.

Martin P Paulus

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Martin P PaulusLaureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, USA. mpaulus@laureateinstitute.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substance use disorders (SUDs) represent complex public health challenges characterized by a blend of genetic, cognitive, environmental, and psychosocial factors. This chapter explores the critical role of interoceptive processing - the internal sensing of physiological states - in the neurobiology and treatment of SUDs. Interoceptive dysfunctions are highlighted as central to the craving, emotional regulation, and decision-making processes that underpin addictive behaviors. The importance of the insula in sustaining drug use, particularly nicotine, underscores a broader involvement of interoceptive pathways in SUDs. Altered interoceptive processing is evident across various SUDs, where individuals demonstrate both a heightened sensitivity to drug-related cues and a diminished ability to process aversive stimuli, suggesting substantial neurobiological underpinnings that complicate treatment outcomes. Moreover, we delve into the theoretical and computational approach to understanding interoceptive processing in SUDs. This perspective utilizes a predictive coding framework, positing that the brain continuously generates and updates predictions about internal states based on sensory inputs. In SUDs, disruptions in this predictive mechanism can lead to inaccuracies in interoceptive perception, contributing significantly to the compulsive nature of drug-seeking behaviors and the challenges associated with treatment. We explore how computational models, such as Bayesian inference, provide insights into the interplay between expected and received interoceptive signals, highlighting the role of hyper-precise prior beliefs in the persistence of craving and impulsivity. This theoretical approach not only deepens our understanding of the neural and cognitive bases of addiction but also suggests novel intervention strategies. By recalibrating interoceptive predictions through targeted therapies, such as neuromodulation and mindfulness training, we can potentially restore the interoceptive accuracy, thereby offering new avenues for effective treatment of SUDs.

Indexed as

BrainInteroceptionSubstance-Related DisordersComputer SimulationCravingHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.