Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39586989›Full record

ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2025

Sequential Transfer of Blastocysts on Day 5 and Day 6 in Patients with Repeated Implantation Failure in Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycle.

Qi Jin, Xiaohua Jiang, Lu Zong, Tong Wu, Shengxia Zheng, Limin Wu, Bo Xu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qi JinCenter for Reproduction and Genetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, No. 17 Lujiang Road, Luyang District, Hefei City, Anhui Province, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2321-8953
Xiaohua JiangCenter for Reproduction and Genetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, No. 17 Lujiang Road, Luyang District, Hefei City, Anhui Province, China.
Lu ZongCenter for Reproduction and Genetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, No. 17 Lujiang Road, Luyang District, Hefei City, Anhui Province, China.
Tong WuInstitute of International Finance, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China.
Shengxia ZhengCenter for Reproduction and Genetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, No. 17 Lujiang Road, Luyang District, Hefei City, Anhui Province, China. sdl901zsx@163.com.
Limin WuCenter for Reproduction and Genetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, No. 17 Lujiang Road, Luyang District, Hefei City, Anhui Province, China. wuliminmail@126.com.
Bo XuCenter for Reproduction and Genetics, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, University of Science and Technology of China, No. 17 Lujiang Road, Luyang District, Hefei City, Anhui Province, China. bio_xubo@163.com.

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 82171599
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate which frozen embryo transfer (FET) strategy benefits the recurrent implantation failure (RIF) population. A retrospective study of 336 women with RIF was performed from July 2020 to October 2023. The patients were divided into three groups according to the FET protocol. The three FET protocols included transferring a blastocyst on both days 5 and 6 (Group 1, n = 138); transferring a cleavage-stage embryo on day 3 and a blastocyst on day 5 (Group 2, n = 55); and transferring double blastocysts on day 5 (Group 3, n = 143).The sequential day 5 and day 6 blastocyst ET strategy significantly improved in vitro fertilization success rates compared with those of both the traditional double-blastocyst day 5 transfer strategy and the strategy involving one cleavage-stage embryo transfer on day 3 and one blastocyst transfer on day 5 in RIF patients. Compared with those observed in Day 5 double-blastocyst transfer, the rates of clinical pregnancy and implantation increased (51.75% vs. 64.49%, P < 0.001 and 37.06% vs. 41.3%, P = 0.005, respectively), while the rates of biochemical pregnancy and multiple gestation decreased (18.18% vs. 12.32%, P = 0.006 and 43.24% vs. 28.09%, P = 0.044, respectively) with the new protocol.Blastocysts from sequential embryo transfer on day 5 and day 6 were more effective than those from the traditional FET protocol at improving pregnancy outcomes and lowering the multiple pregnancy rate in RIF patients. When only one or zero good-quality blastocysts are available, sequential blastocyst ET on days 5 and 6 should be considered.

Indexed as

BlastocystCryopreservationEmbryo ImplantationEmbryo TransferAdultFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansPregnancyPregnancy RateRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsBlastocyst transferEndometrial receptivityRecurrent implantation failure (RIF)Sequential embryo transferWindow of implantation (WOI)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.