Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39586936›Full record

ArticleJournal of community genetics2024

Engaging communities: A scoping literature review of community-based participatory research in genetics service delivery settings.

Heather A Zierhut, Pranathi Kandikonda, Emily M Simon, Cameron Donarski, Megan Kocher, Mariana Ramírez, Crystal Y Lumpkins, Elena R Fisher

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of community genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Engaging Chinese and Korean American communities in dementia research: A journey of inclusivity and partnership.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Heather A ZierhutDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, 6-160 Jackson Hall, 321 Church Street Southeast, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA. zier0034@umn.edu.
Pranathi KandikondaDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, 6-160 Jackson Hall, 321 Church Street Southeast, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Emily M SimonDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, 6-160 Jackson Hall, 321 Church Street Southeast, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Cameron DonarskiDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, 6-160 Jackson Hall, 321 Church Street Southeast, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Megan KocherUniversity of Minnesota Libraries, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.
Mariana RamírezDepartment of Population Health, JUNTOS Center for Advancing Latino Health, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Boulevard, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA.
Crystal Y LumpkinsDepartment of Communication, University of Utah, 255 South Central Campus Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Elena R FisherDepartment of Genetics, Cell Biology, and Development, University of Minnesota, 6-160 Jackson Hall, 321 Church Street Southeast, Minneapolis, MN, 55455, USA.

Funding

University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
Genetic Counseling Processes Result in Outcomes (GC-PRO) StudyR01HG011916 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI ZIERHUT, HEATHER · 2022 to 2025
$2.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG011916NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG0119160
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic counseling (GC) services have the potential to improve health outcomes, yet there are documented disparities in the use of GC services among minoritized racial/ethnic populations. Community-based participatory research (CBPR) is an approach to integrate diverse patient perspectives to improve GC services. The objective of this review was to assess the current state of international CBPR within GC and genetics services from 2006 to 2023. Five databases were searched for inclusion criteria: 1) published in 2006 or later; 2) peer-reviewed publication; 3) primary research studies; 4) community-based AND participatory research; 5) focused on GC, clinical genetics, testing, and/or genetic service delivery. Criteria for evaluating CBPR involvement used a synthesis of best processes framework. Screening of 3,824 studies identified 16 papers (n = 12 qualitative; n = 1 quantitative; n = 3 mixed methods). The majority of studies were conducted within the U.S. (n = 12), focused on cancer (n = 5), involved the Asian/Pacific Islander community (n = 8), and centered around genetic education (n = 12). Community partners most frequently were involved in recruitment (n = 12) and results analysis (n = 12) and least involved in research question development (n = 7) and product creation (n = 6). Studies varied substantially in the integration of 9 CBPR gold standard principles with only three studies addressing all nine principles. Few CBPR projects in GC services exist and a lack of guidelines to assess the quality of CBPR methodologies hindered the appraisal of studies. CBPR represents a promising approach to improve GC services and should be explored by genetics service delivery researchers.

Indexed as

Community-based participatory researchCommunity-engaged researchGenetic counselingGenetic service deliveryHealth equityRacial/ethnic minority and underrepresented populations

Identifiers

PMID39586936
PMCPMC11645335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.