Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39586933›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2025

The impact of fluconazole use on the fungal and bacterial microbiomes in recurrent Vulvovaginal Candidiasis (RVVC): a pilot study of vaginal and gastrointestinal site interplay.

Moira Bradfield Strydom, Tiffanie M Nelson, Sohil Khan, Ramesh L Walpola, Robert S Ware, Evelin Tiralongo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Moira Bradfield StrydomSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia. moira.bradfieldstrydom@alumni.griffithuni.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5116-8132
Tiffanie M NelsonBiostatistics Unit, Griffith Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5341-312X
Sohil KhanSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0477-388X
Ramesh L WalpolaSchool of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6739-0558
Robert S WareBiostatistics Unit, Griffith Health, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6129-6736
Evelin TiralongoSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1337-0321

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRecurrent Vulvovaginal Candidiasis (RVVC) is a problematic clinical condition for which fluconazole treatment is commonly prescribed. This study investigated the interkingdom vaginal and gastrointestinal microbiomes of RVVC patients who use fluconazole intermittently or as longer-term maintenance therapy for symptom management and compared them to healthy controls.

methodsVaginal swabs and fecal samples were collected. A novel interkingdom analysis was performed using 16 S rRNA and ITS1 gene sequencing to compare the diversity and taxonomic composition of vaginal microbiome (VMB) and gastrointestinal microbiome (GIMB).

resultsTwenty-seven women participated: 10 intermittent users and healthy controls and 7 maintenance therapy. The study revealed that microbiomes of fluconazole users do not differ in diversity metrics from healthy controls. RVVC patients using intermittent fluconazole displayed a higher abundance of vaginal C. albicans than healthy controls. Candida species pairings were not commonly observed between sites in individuals and, as such a fecal reservoir is unlikely to be implicated in recurrent symptomatology. In many of the RVVC non-Candida fungal spp. were identified in the vaginal microbiome. Users of fluconazole displayed elevations of the CST-I (Community State Type 1) associated bacterium L. crispatus. All participants displaying vaginal Candida spp. belonged to either bacterial CST-I or CST-III (Community State Type 3- L. iners associated).

conclusionTo our knowledge, this is the first study to compare the interkingdom VMB-GIMB of women with RVVC using oral fluconazole. As fluconazole users in this study represent a typical RVVC population, trends observed in microbial abundance require further analysis to establish fluconazole's long-term microbiome safety. Examining the microbiome at both sites adds to the current understanding of microbial associated with the condition.

Indexed as

Antifungal AgentsBacteriaCandidiasis, VulvovaginalFluconazoleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaVaginaAdultCandidaFecesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsRecurrenceRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAntifungal AgentsFluconazoleRNA, Ribosomal, 16SFluconazoleMaintenance therapyMycobiomeRecurrent vulvovaginal candidiasisVaginal microbiome

Identifiers

PMID39586933
PMCPMC11754358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.