ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2025
Challenges and Opportunities in the Adoption of p-TIPS for Acute Variceal Bleeding: Insights from a US Tertiary Center.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsSince the overwhelmingly positive results of the 'early use of TIPS' published in 2010, studies in Europe and Asia have confirmed early/pre-emptive transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (p-TIPS) in high-risk patients with acute variceal bleed (AVB) reduces treatment failure and mortality compared to standard of care (SOC). There are no studies evaluating p-TIPS in a US cohort.
methodsA review of patients with cirrhosis from June 2010 to June 2020 with AVB was conducted from a single large US center.
resultsOf 745 cirrhotic patients with AVB, 18% met criteria for p-TIPS. Alcohol and HCV accounted for 75% of etiology; 13% MASLD. The mean MELD-Na score in our cohort was 24, which is ten points higher than reported in the literature for over 600 p-TIPS cases. Only 9 patients underwent p-TIPS. Patients undergoing p-TIPS were less likely to have MASLD, more likely to be female and less likely to have PSE at baseline. One-year mortality in the SOC group (including patients undergoing 'rescue TIPS') was 53% versus 0% for p-TIPS (p = 0.01).
conclusionOur observation suggests hesitancy among providers to recommend p-TIPS, likely due to concerns regarding a 'sicker' patient population. The current SOC in high-risk patients remain suboptimal. Limited data, including our own, suggest that p-TIPS may confer a survival benefit even in patients with high MELD. However, the recommendation of p-TIPS in such patients necessitates validation of its safety and efficacy. Consequently, we advocate for a RCT in the US to conclusively assess the utility of p-TIPS in this context. Until such evidence is established, it is likely that underutilization of this life-saving intervention will persist.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39586926What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.